Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
43 <br /> Approved 7/1/2015 <br /> 51 <br /> 52 Tom Heffner: FedEx will be encouraged to use the subdivision streets rather than the private road. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 Pete Hallenbeck: Is that road going to be taken off the GIS system as a road that segment there? If you <br /> 55 don't it would show up for emergency responders as a valid route they could take. <br /> 56 <br /> 57 Craig Benedict: Probably addressing off that road and emergency services has a point on Erwin Road <br /> 58 where they expect to see that road. They will have an asterisk on it because of what has happened around <br /> 59 it but my thought process is that if the address is off that road indicate the point of entry for those lots, it will <br /> 60 remain on the GIS system. <br /> 61 <br /> 62 Pete Hallenbeck: They are currently switching to a system of closely dispatch that looks for all possible <br /> 63 roads and routes and there is no mechanism to show if the road is full access or not. <br /> 64 <br /> 65 Michael Harvey: You will probably see that occur if the project is approved and recorded. This will remain <br /> 66 as an easement(Mr. Harvey was pointing to a map of the identified easement area) but the road name will <br /> 67 be removed. <br /> 68 <br /> 69 Paul Guthrie: On the open space buffering outside the lot, what is going to be the legal long-term <br /> 70 ownership and legal responsibility for that property? <br /> 71 <br /> 72 Tom Heffner: It would be owned by a homeowner's association as incorporated body. Their legal <br /> 73 documents would require their ownership and their maintenance of the property and then in turn there <br /> 74 would be homeowner's dues paid by the people living in the subdivision that would fund that work on an <br /> 75 ongoing basis. <br /> 76 <br /> 77 Michael Harvey: If this is approved with a flexible development layout, there will be provisions in the <br /> 78 resolution of approval as there are in all major subdivision based on the flexibility and design guidelines to <br /> 79 preclude the clearing of the trees within the dedicated open space except for any activity recognized by the <br /> 80 board such as the installation of a trial or recreation area. <br /> 81 <br /> 82 Paul Guthrie: My question was about long term liability and things that take place on that and the ability or <br /> 83 not of that being removed from open space. <br /> 84 <br /> 85 Michael Harvey: This area could not be removed from open space unless the applicant came back to the <br /> 86 county to request a modification of the major subdivision. I will state that we would probably object to it <br /> 87 being removed because that is how it was originally approved and we are not interested in seeing <br /> 88 dedicated open space turned into developed area. <br /> 89 <br /> 90 James Lea: Does Lot 9 actually take up part of the pond? <br /> 91 <br /> 92 Tom Heffner: Yes. The pond size will be modified. Since it is not a spring fed pond, in the summer when <br /> 93 we have less rain, it drops significantly so my goal is that we will reduce the physical area of the pond to try <br /> 94 to have a more stable water level. The line is showing the maximum size of the pond. <br /> 95 <br /> 96 James Lea: What happens when you have flooding with the pond? <br /> 97 <br /> 98 Tom Heffner: Earth Centric engineering is doing storm water plan we have had several meetings on how to <br /> 99 handle that. We can increase the storm water flow downstream to the properties over to the right. We are <br /> 2 <br />