Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-07-2015 - 7-a - Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application – Henderson Woods
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 12-07-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 12-07-2015 - 7-a - Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application – Henderson Woods
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2015 9:43:18 AM
Creation date
12/4/2015 9:11:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/7/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 12-07-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
RES-2015-067 Resolution approving Henderson Woods Preliminary Subdivision Plat
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 <br /> Meeting Highlights: <br /> Orange County Planning staff presented the 20 attendees with an overview of: the <br /> application; the site; surrounding area; site environmental constraints, the zoning and subdivision <br /> requirements and the tentative schedule for the plan's review and approval or denial by the Orange <br /> County Board of Commissioners. <br /> Mr. Hefner, presented his site analysis, the Concept Plan, the basis for the design, plan <br /> revisions based on meetings with Orange County staff, NCDOT recommendations, site <br /> observations, environmental assessments and environmental and developments constraints <br /> associated with the property. He then opened up the meeting to comments, ideas and questions <br /> from the residents. Dr. Humphries was not present at the meeting. <br /> The questions and concerns from residents centered on the following categories: <br /> 1. Vehicular Access and Traffic. <br /> • Residents expressed concerns about the potential for traffic congestion on Erwin and <br /> Whitfield (especially during the AM and PM peak hours). Residents with access via <br /> Shakori Trails were also concerned with maintaining their current legal access. <br /> Residents who live off Turkey Farm Road also raised concerns that they would be <br /> negatively affected by traffic <br /> • Orange County Planning Staff outlined the access, public and private street <br /> standards, the merits of locating the proposed access onto Whitfield Road vs. Erwin <br /> Road, the connections to Shakori Trails, and the internal circulation of the proposed <br /> plan. <br /> • Mr. Hefner outlined his meetings with NCDOT, the site constraints, legal obligations <br /> to provide access to Erwin Road for the two Shakori Trails homes, Emergency <br /> Service Access. He also noted the AM and PM traffic patterns that had been <br /> observed on Whitfield and Erwin Roads, and that the estimated amount of additional <br /> cars (approximately 38 new cars) from the proposed new residencies would not <br /> cause a harmful impact to the road network. <br /> 2. Lot Size, Density and Open Space . <br /> • Residents expressed concerns about the 1 acre minimum lot size, the number of <br /> units, preserving the character of the area, the Rural Buffer, New Hope Creek and <br /> Duke Forest. <br /> • Orange Planning Staff reviewed the UDO requirements, the perimeter setback and <br /> buffers, the value of the Flexible Design Option with dedicated common Open <br /> Space, the effective density (2.5 dwelling units per acre), and best planning practices <br /> for environmentally sensitive design. Staff also noted that the site's zoning and <br /> watershed would allow for up to 24 dwelling units. <br /> • Mr. Hefner reviewed the market analysis, site constraints, the initial concept plans <br /> which yielded 22-24 lots, the suitable soils, and steep slopes. He noted the desire to <br /> preserve common areas in dedicated open space vs. 19 lots. In response to a <br /> resident inquiry, he also noted that that any person with a lot can choose his/her own <br /> residential builder. <br /> 3. Setbacks, Buffers and Tree Preservation. <br /> ■ Residents asked questions about setbacks, buffers and areas along the perimeter of <br /> the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.