Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-17-2015 - 6a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 11-17-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-17-2015 - 6a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2015 4:29:30 PM
Creation date
11/12/2015 4:24:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/17/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-17-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> 1 grant funding and does not address the on-going fee structure that would be used to pay for <br /> 2 regular operations and maintenance. These available tools can be used in combination. <br /> 3 Initial Financing <br /> 4 1. The governmental partners could lend or grant money to the District to fund construction. <br /> 5 a. The terms of loan repayment, if any, could include provisions for the <br /> 6 District to pay interest or for portions of the loan to be forgiven upon defined conditions. <br /> 7 b. There are ways that a local government partner could borrow money to be loaned or <br /> 8 granted to the District if a partner wanted to explore that option. <br /> 9 c. Funds could be either paid to the District up front or on an as-needed basis over the <br /> 10 project construction period. <br /> 11 2. The District could borrow money from a third-party lender. <br /> 12 a. The District could use most of the tools regularly available to North Carolina local <br /> 13 governments, including general obligation bonds, (subject to a vote of the residents of <br /> 14 the District) non-voted installment financing (which uses the financed assets as collateral <br /> 15 for the loan), or revenue bonds (which pledges net operating revenues of the system as <br /> 16 security for the loan). <br /> 17 b. Because the District will be a new operating entity with a small scope, a private lender <br /> 18 might well ask one or more of the governmental partners to provide "moral obligation" <br /> 19 backing to a District loan which is a promise to consider funding a loan payment that the <br /> 20 District could not otherwise pay. This would be an annual, "subject to appropriation" <br /> 21 promise similar to the County's commitment to its installment financings and limited <br /> 22 obligation bonds. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Cost Recovery <br /> 25 The District would have most of the same tools to raise revenue as other general <br /> 26 purpose local governments. <br /> 27 • Property tax—a rate would be established annually by the Board of Commissioners. There is <br /> 28 no obligation to levy a separate property tax within the District. <br /> 29 • Water and sewer rates, fees and charges — including usage fees and availability fees, as well <br /> 30 as capital charges for new service <br /> 31 • Special assessments against benefitted properties — allows the District to collect funds over a <br /> 32 ten-year period. Please note that special assessments can be assessed to recover less than all <br /> 33 of the costs of a project, and that installments can, but are not required to, include a component <br /> 34 of interest over time. <br /> 35 • Sales taxes —the District would not share in sales tax distributions. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Commissioner Dorosin asked what would happen if the OWASA disagreed with the <br /> 38 County's requests or plans. <br /> 39 Commissioner Jacobs said there can be differential rates. <br /> 40 Commissioner Dorosin said his concern is that the project is not being put out to bid, <br /> 41 and OWASA may not want to do what the County requests. He said having differential rates is <br /> 42 a clear advantage. <br /> 43 Bob Jessup said OWASA can speak for themselves on this question. He said the <br /> 44 second reason to focus on the district was that the defined area may assist the three <br /> 45 jurisdictions in doing joint planning. He said the district itself does not have any land use <br /> 46 authority. He said the third reason to focus on the district is the idea that the district might be <br /> 47 eligible for loan and grant programs that the County is not otherwise eligible for on its own. He <br /> 48 said the Department of Agriculture programs are the best example of that. <br /> 49 Commissioner Price asked who would write and manage such grants. <br /> 50 Bob Jessup said the district would contract that responsibility or assign it to staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.