Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-20-2007-2c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 09-20-2007
>
Agenda - 09-20-2007-2c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 3:50:17 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:47:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/20/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070920
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The North Carolina League of Municipalities <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />OPEB-A bill with positive financial implications for local governments, SB 580 -State <br />Treasurer/Local OPEB Investrne~zts (SL 2007-384, was enacted into law this session. The act establishes <br />the Local Government Other Post-Employment Benefits Fund in the Office of the State Treasurer and <br />authorizes local governments to contribute to the fund. The Treasurer will be able to make investments <br />that are likely to allow a greater rate of return than would be achieved by local investment. The <br />accumulated contributions are to be used to provide other post-employment benefits to former employees <br />of participating local governments and beneficiaries of former employees who are entitled to other <br />employment benefits. The bill also authorizes local governments to establish other irrevocable trusts to <br />fund post-employment benefits and provides similar authority for the law enforcement officers' Special <br />Separation Allowance. <br />The bill was a top priority of the League and was strongly supported by municipal finance officers. <br />Standards for local government accounting and fmancial reporting require that cities accrue the liability for <br />post-employment benefits such as health insurance and life insurance costs. Cities must show the present <br />value of these future benefits for current employees on their balance sheets. The accrued liabilities can be <br />quite large, and local governments need additional options for investments if they choose to pre-fund the <br />benefits. <br />Property Tax-Property tax relief was an issue on many legislators' minds this session. Numerous <br />proposals were introduced but ultimately FIB' 1499 -Property Tax and PUV Changes a~:d Studies was <br />the one that passed. It increases the benefit of the property tax homestead exclusion by raising both the <br />income eligibility limit and the amount excluded from taxation to $25,000. The bill authorizes the <br />Revenue Laws Study Committee to study whether and how to index the minimum amount that is excluded <br />from tax. The bill also provides for a property tax deferral benefit for North Carolina residents who have <br />owned and occupied property located in the state as a permanent residence for at least five years and are <br />either 65 years of age or older or totally and permanently disabled. The amount of taxes deferred would be <br />based upon the income eligibility limit of the property tax homestead exclusion. Under this "circuit <br />breaker" system, an owner who met the eligibility requirements and made less than the income eligibility <br />limit could elect to defer the portion of taxes imposed on the permanent residence that exceeds 4% of the <br />owner's income. An owner who met the requirements of the circuit breaker benefit and made between the <br />income eligibility limit and one and one-half times the income eligibility limit could elect to defer the <br />portion of taxes imposed on the permanent residence that exceeds 5% of the owner's income. <br />Taxes deferred via the circuit breaker benefit would accrue interest and become a lien on the real property <br />of the taxpayer. The general rule is that these deferred taxes would be carried forward until the death of <br />the owner or until the owner transfers the property, at which time the amount of taxes for that year with no <br />circuit breaker benefit plus those taxes deferred for the preceding three fiscal years, together with interest; <br />would become due and payable within nine months after the date of death or transfer. An exception to this <br />rule allows the deferral to continue when the residence is transferred to the owner's spouse, if the spouse <br />qualifies for the circuit breaker benefit, occupies the property as a permanent residence, and elects to <br />continue deferral. <br />If the owner ceases to use the property as a permanent residence for a reason other than a temporary <br />absence for reasons of health or an extended absence while confined to a rest home or nursing home while <br />the residence remains either unoccupied or occupied by the owner's spouse or other dependent, the owner <br />loses the benefit of the circuit breaker, and the deferred taxes become due and payable at the same time the <br />tax levied on the residence in that year is due. If the owner fails to qualify for the circuit breaker benefit <br />for a taxable year but continues using the property as a permanent residence, no deferral is allowed for that <br />year but deferred taxesfrom earlier years do not become due. The circuit breaker provisions are effective <br />July 1, 2009. <br />Finally, the bill modifies the present-use value requirements for agricultural land used as an aquatic <br />species farm and authorizes the Revenue Laws Study Committee to study various modifications and <br />expansions to the present-use value system. <br />SB 646 - E~:act Waterfratt Access Study Commission Recommei:datior:s provides a special use value <br />classification system for "working waterfront property" similar to the current agricultural present use value <br />system. Working waterfront property is described as property that has, for the most recent three-year <br />period, produced an average gross income of at least $1,000 and is either a pier that extends into coastal <br />fishing waters and limits access to those who pay a fee or is land that is adjacent to coastal fishing waters <br />and is primarily used for a commercial fishing operation or fish processing, including adjacent land that is <br />under improvements used for one of these purposes. Another proposal on present use value, HB 1889 - <br />Present Use Value System Modifications, was not enacted but it passed the House and will be eligible in <br />2008. It would classify wildlife conservation land as property that must be appraised at present use value. <br />http://www.Helm..org/LegaUBulletin/2007/08-24-07.htm 8/28/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.