Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-20-2007-2c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 09-20-2007
>
Agenda - 09-20-2007-2c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 3:50:17 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:47:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/20/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070920
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />Donna Coffey <br />From: LEE MANDELL [LMandell@NCLM.ORG] <br />Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:27 PM <br />To: The nclgba mailing list ' <br />Subject: [nclgba] Medicaid Tax Swap <br />Many of you have been asking for an explanation of the local sales tax impact of the Medicaid <br />Swap provisions in the budget bill (HB1473). What follows below is from the League's GA <br />Session Wrap-Up Legislative Bulletin, the full version of which is now available on our website: <br />~:/lwww.nclm.org/Legal/Bulletin/2007/08-24-07.htm. <br />Lee <br />Lee M. Mandell, Ph.D. <br />Director of IT and Research/CIO <br />NC League of Municipalities <br />PO Box 3069 <br />Raleigh, NC 27602-3069 <br />Phone: 919.715.3933 <br />Fax: 919.733.9519 <br />The big news in the budget, of course, was the Medicaid relief package and "sales tax swap" that was used to <br />accomplish it. With passage of the state budget, the General Assembly adopted aphased-in take over of the <br />county share of Medicaid expenses. As the state assumes county Medicaid expenses, it will, in turn, take over a <br />portion of the local option sales tax revenues. <br />The last one-half cent local option sales tax-Article 44-is the affected tax. The state will take over one-half of <br />this tax (that is, one-quarter cent) effective October 1, 2008 and take over the remaining one-quarter cent <br />effective October 1, 2009. Municipalities currently receive a share of the proceeds from the Article 44 sales tax <br />and will be reimbursed for the loss of those revenues. The method of replacement includes a growth factor. The <br />first one-quarter cent lost will be replaced by a payment equal to one-half of what each municipality receives from <br />the Article 40 local sales tax. The Article 40 tax is a one-half cent tax distributed back to the county level on a per <br />capita basis, so the first hold harmless, which begins October 1, 2008, is equal to half of this one-half cent - in <br />other words, aquarter-cent, just like what is being taken away. Since there is growth in the Article 40 tax <br />proceeds, there will be growth in the hold harmless payments. <br />Effective October 1, 2009, municipalities will receive a second hold harmless payment equal to one-quarter of the <br />one-cent Article 39 local sales tax. This is a tax distributed back to the county area on point of delivery, just like <br />the tax being taken over by the state. Again, the hold harmless payment is tied to the amount received from an <br />existing revenue source so any growth will be included. <br />The money for the hold harmless payments to cities comes from the counties' share of sales tax revenues. The <br />NC Department of Revenue will make both hold harmless payments directly to cities, and there is no expiration <br />date on this hold harmless. <br />In a related measure, the state budget changed the Article 42 local option sales tax from per capita to point of <br />delivery distribution, which will affect the total amount of tax proceeds returned to each county area for distribution <br />among the county and the municipalities in that county. [1"his change does not affect the method that counties <br />choose to distribute tax proceeds among the county and its municipalities -either per capita or ad valorem.] <br />8/28/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.