Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-2015 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 11-05-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-05-2015 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2015 9:35:21 AM
Creation date
10/30/2015 9:13:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-05-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> 1 o Impact Analysis completed by Everett `Vic' Knight on <br /> 2 how the project complied with the UDO. <br /> 3 • Staff testimony and abstract package from May 26, 2015 <br /> 4 quarterly public hearing. <br /> 5 • Planning Board packet from July 1, 2015 regular meeting. <br /> 6 AND <br /> 7 • A lack of competent material evidence in the record <br /> 8 demonstrating the applicant did not comply with the UDO. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> 11 the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b), the <br /> 12 Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is <br /> 13 absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the <br /> 14 claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) <br /> 15 (2) (b). <br /> 16 <br /> 17 L.II�IIIIIII: U IINA\U II IM U S <br /> 18 <br /> 19 i i . imir h� �i� r �s �y �.i� �, s <br /> ecor1e1 Ib Q,oirirhirirhisslioirieir <br /> 20 Pel li�:�s ie r fli iri d i iri ,Ire -it Iii <br /> 21 ��orir'hl llli��s with ����cti�:�ir�����-.3.2 (A) (2) (c) of the U.00 in that the Use is in <br /> 22 hain"riony with the area in which it is to be 1located and the Use is in <br /> 23 corir'hl llliance with the I plan for I physical deveIlopir°irheint of the ("'.0Uinty as <br /> 24 eirirhlbodied in these ir eg U Ilatioiris and in the Q',.,;oir°ir,iIpir'e ieiris:ive IPlan. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 This irirhotlion is 1based on corir'hl etent irirhateirlial and evidence enteired Into <br /> 27 the irecoird of these I iroceedings, lInClUdiiriq: <br /> 28 <br /> 29 NOTE—the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If <br /> 30 the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> 31 compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) this list must be read verbatim <br /> 32 so it is in the record. <br /> 33 Application package and testimony including: <br /> 34 o Biological Inventory completed by The Catena Group; <br /> 35 o Forest Stewardship Plan completed by Kelly Douglass; <br /> 36 o Impact Analysis completed by Everett `Vic' Knight <br /> 37 o Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) completed by <br /> 38 SEPI Engineering <br /> 39 o State Clearing House comments on how the project <br /> 40 complied with the UDO. <br /> 41 Staff testimony and abstract package from May 26, 2015 quarterly <br /> 42 public hearing. <br /> 43 Planning Board packet from July 1, 2015 regular meeting. <br /> 44 AND <br /> 45 A lack of competent material evidence in the record <br /> 46 demonstrating the applicant did not comply with the UDO. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> 49 the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c), the <br /> 50 Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.