Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
8 <br /> 1 corriplies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a) of the L00 lire that the Use will <br /> 2 irriaintain and piroirriote the I pLflbliC health, safety and geneiral welft-lire, lIf <br /> 3 located wheire I piroposed and developed and opeirated accoirding to the <br /> 4 plan -IS SLflbirriitted. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 This irriotion lIs 1based on corripetent irriateirial and evidence enteired unto <br /> 7 the irecoird of these I piroceedings, InClUding: <br /> 8 <br /> 9 NOTE—the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If <br /> 10 the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> 11 compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a) this list must be read verbatim <br /> 12 so it is in the record. <br /> 13 Application package and testimony including: <br /> 14 o Biological Inventory completed by The Catena Group; <br /> 15 o Forest Stewardship Plan completed by Kelly Douglass; <br /> 16 o Impact Analysis completed by Everett `Vic' Knight <br /> 17 o Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) completed by <br /> 18 SEPI Engineering <br /> 19 o State Clearinghouse comments on how the project <br /> 20 complied with the UDO. <br /> 21 Staff testimony and abstract package from May 26, 2015 <br /> 22 quarterly public hearing. <br /> 23 Planning Board packet from July 1, 2015 regular meeting. <br /> 24 AND <br /> 25 A lack of competent material evidence in the record <br /> 26 demonstrating the applicant did not comply with the UDO. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> 29 the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a), the <br /> 30 Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is <br /> 31 absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the <br /> 32 claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) <br /> 33 (2) (a). <br /> 34 <br /> 35 VORC: UlNA\flHMOUS <br /> 36 <br /> 37 IL A irriotion was irriade by Rich, Seconded by (',.,.oi"ir,iir"ir,iIiss1loirieir <br /> 38 Pirice flinding theire Is SUfficient evidence In the irecoird the I pir(.,)ject <br /> 39 corriplies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) of the L00 lire that the Use will <br /> 40 irriaintain the VcIlUe of conflgUOUS piropeirty. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 This irriotion lIs 1based on corripetent irriateirial and evidence enteired linto <br /> 43 the irecoird of these I piroceedings, InClUding: <br /> 44 <br /> 45 NOTE—the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If <br /> 46 the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> 47 compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) this list must be read verbatim <br /> 48 so it is in the record. <br /> 49 • Application package and testimony including: <br />