Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br /> I b A irriotion was i by Rich, seconded by Pirice <br /> 2 fi iri d I iri g t h e a ant has corriplied with the Ipir ovisio iris of Section 2.7.5 of the <br /> 3 ra iri g e it-Jinified IDeveIIoIpirrient Ordinance as detailed Iby the findings <br /> 4 contained within Attachirrient 5 of the at)stiract 1 package. <br /> 5 VOTE: LJNAN1M0LJS <br /> 6 <br /> 7 NOTE— if the motion is to reject the individual making the motion will need to <br /> 8 provide some explanation justifying the finding that the applicant has not <br /> 9 established, through competent material and substantial evidence, the project is <br /> 10 in compliance with Section 2.7.5 of the UDO. <br /> 12 c. A irriotion was i by Rich, seconded by <br /> 13 Pelissier finding the a,pjA�iqant has with the pirovisions of Section 5.3.2 (B) of the <br /> 14 0irainge it-Jinified IDevelopirlrient Ordinance as detailed Iby the findings <br /> 15 contained within Attachirrient 5 of the at)stiract 1 package. Second. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 VOTE: LJNAN1M0LJS <br /> 18 <br /> 19 NOTE— if the motion is to reject the individual making the motion will need to <br /> 20 provide some explanation justifying the finding that the applicant has not <br /> 21 established, through competent material and substantial evidence, the project is <br /> 22 in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (B) of the UDO. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 d� A irriotion was i by Rich, seconded by Pirice <br /> 25 finding the corriplied with the Ipir ovisio iris of Section 5J3.4 of the <br /> 26 ()ra iri g e ("'.0Unty it-Jinified Developirrient Ordinance as detailed by the findings <br /> 27 contained within Attachirrient 5 of the at)stiract 1 package. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 VOTE: LJ WAIN 1M0LJS <br /> 30 <br /> 31 NOTE— if the motion is to reject the individual making the motion will need to <br /> 32 provide some explanation justifying the finding that the applicant has not <br /> 33 established, through competent material and substantial evidence, the project is <br /> 34 in compliance with Section 5.8.4 (B) of the UDO. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 e. A irriotion will need to IIu e i regairding corripliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) of <br /> 37 the Ordinance as follows <br /> 38 <br /> 39 NOTE—Whomever makes the motion will have to cite the `evidence' in the <br /> 40 record utilized justifying the motion to approve or deny. Attachment 5 contains <br /> 41 the recommendations of the Planning Board including the evidence utilized to <br /> 42 reach the conclusion. This 'evidence' must be spelled out explicitly by the <br /> 43 Commissioner making the motion. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 If the motion is to deny then the Commissioner making the motion will have to <br /> 46 spell out explicitly the evidence within the record utilized to justify a negative <br /> 47 finding: <br /> 48 <br /> 49 L A irriotion was i by Rich, seconded by (',.,.oiY"ir,iiY"ir,iIissIloirieir <br /> g e , eire ��is SUfficient evidence in the irecord the �pir(.,)ject 50 Doirosin findin <br />