Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-2015 - 5-e - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Public Hearing Process Revisions - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 11-05-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-05-2015 - 5-e - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Public Hearing Process Revisions - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2015 10:00:02 AM
Creation date
10/30/2015 9:09:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5e
Document Relationships
2015-594 SOC of Proposed UDO Text Amendment to revise the existing public hearing process
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2015
Minutes 11-05-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
ORD-2015-031 Ordinance Amending the UDO Ordinance of Orange County and Planning Board Policies and Procedures
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 2: Procedures 28 <br /> Section 2.7: Special Use Permits <br /> (4) The Board of County Commissioners and Planning Rnarrt30 shall review the <br /> application during a regularly sGheduled publiG hearing a meeting designated as <br /> a Quarterly Public Hearing. <br /> (5) All evidence shall be submitted during the public hearing. If additional evidence <br /> is requested by the Board of County Commissioners during a hearing which must <br /> be submitted at a later date, the hearing shall be continued to a date/time certain <br /> in order to receive the additional evidence.31 <br /> (7�)The RGAFd of G9 into GE)FAMORS09ARPS may rlirent the DlanniRg Beard to previde a <br /> not sn rlirent fho DlanniRg Rnard- shall make ifs rennmmenrlatinn y.f0th0n three <br /> (8) if the Planning Reard fails, to make o rennmmenrlofinn )Adthin the time olk)ttA l <br /> (9) After closing the <br /> public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners shall <br /> do one of the following: <br /> (a) ApprGva-� <br /> (b) Ap preyal;niith nnnrlitinn8; Gr <br /> (c) DRAORI <br /> (a) Defer action to a later Board of County Commissioners meeting date, or <br /> (b) Act upon the application. <br /> (10) Board of County Commissioner action on the application shall include making <br /> appropriate findings of fact pursuant to Section 2.7.11, stating whether the board <br /> concludes each of the applicable standards have been met and one of the <br /> following: <br /> (a) Approval; <br /> (b) Approval but with specified conditions as provided in Section 2.7.12; or <br /> (c) Denial. <br /> (B) For Class B Special Use Permits, the following shall apply: <br /> (1) The Board of Adjustment shall review the application during a regularly <br /> scheduled public hearing. <br /> (2) The Board of Adjustment shall conduct the hearing in accordance within the <br /> provisions detailed in this Section as well as those contained within Section 2.12. <br /> (3) After mss#closing the public hearing, the Board of Adjustment shall take <br /> action upon the application. This action shall ba include making appropriate <br /> findings of fact pursuant to Section 2.7.11, stating whether the board concludes <br /> each of the applicable standards have been met and one of the following: <br /> (a) Approval; <br /> 30 While the Planning Board is expected to attend the public hearing,a quorum of Planning Board members will <br /> not be necessary in order to conduct the hearing. <br /> 31 In order to meet legal requirements for quasi-judicial proceedings,staff is suggesting this proposed language. <br /> Evidence would no longer be allowed to be submitted in writing after the quasi-judicial hearing. Instead, <br /> additional evidence would have to be presented by experts at a subsequent hearing(which does not necessarily <br /> have to be a quarterly public hearing date). <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 2-24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.