Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-20-2015 - 8a - Report on the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Assessment of Orange Public Transit (OPT)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 10-20-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 10-20-2015 - 8a - Report on the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Assessment of Orange Public Transit (OPT)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2016 1:31:05 PM
Creation date
10/16/2015 8:01:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/20/2015
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-20-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
59 <br /> Chapter 3:Service Supplied and Performance <br /> The values in Table 3-4 are estimates based on a single month VUD report of statistics by <br /> contract or service type, as described in the previous chapter. They may not accurately <br /> represent each service, but the overall estimates are similar to annual figures supplied by <br /> OPT to NCDOT. This table represents a potential model for OPT to track performance <br /> by service, if this data is collected monthly and then aggregated. It could be used to track <br /> trends within OPT, and could be used to compare with benchmarks from other systems, <br /> or from the National Transit Database. <br /> SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> OPT has greatly improved its data collection and analysis capabilities over the past <br /> several years. It is now able to respond to NCDOT data requests with reasonably accurate <br /> representative data. When current information is compared to peer systems (as identified <br /> by the state), OPT is classified as "Superior" on the measures used, with the exception of <br /> the subsidy per passenger. This likely reflects that the county is subsidizing demand <br /> response passengers whose trips are paid by agency contracts in other systems, which is <br /> then reported as revenue to the transit system. <br /> OPT can do more to track performance of key measures by service type and contract. It <br /> should do this as its service expands and new service types are offered. Once trends for <br /> OPT measures are evident, comparisons with other similar services will be possible.A <br /> concern is that ridership on the new fixed route services should be appropriate to the <br /> amount of investment in the service. For example, the estimated cost per trip of the Hill- <br /> to-Hill fixed route service in Table 3-4 is the same as the average demand response cost <br /> per trip. This suggests that it might have been just as cost-effective to provide those trips <br /> on a demand response basis.As service is added on that route, one would hope that the <br /> ridership increases sufficiently to result in a lower cost per trip that demand response or <br /> even route deviation services could provide. The only way to know this is if the county <br /> tracks the appropriate data. <br /> NCDOT Orange County 43 KFH <br /> Transit Assessment Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.