Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-20-2015 - 8a - Report on the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Assessment of Orange Public Transit (OPT)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 10-20-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 10-20-2015 - 8a - Report on the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Assessment of Orange Public Transit (OPT)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2016 1:31:05 PM
Creation date
10/16/2015 8:01:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/20/2015
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-20-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
48 <br /> Chapter 2: Costs and Funding <br /> The resulting equation for Orange County services is: <br /> Equation with Grants Discounted <br /> ($49.28 Per Hour) x ($o.73 per Mile) x (-$2.25 per Passenger) = Cost Allocation <br /> Although the results of the equation below are not included in this report, it is useful to note <br /> the difference in cost per passenger without the CTP grants discounted. <br /> Equation without Grants Discounted <br /> ($49.2$ Per Hour) x ($o.73 per Mile) x ($0.53 per Passenger) = Cost Allocation <br /> This equation was applied to estimated miles, hours and ridership for the various OPT services, <br /> and compared to the funding associated with each service. OPT has not tracked miles or hours <br /> by contract or program in the past, so an estimate was developed by using the April 2014 <br /> vehicle utilization report and assigning each vehicle run in that six day sample to one <br /> predominating service or contract, recognizing that some trips from different programs may be <br /> mixed in. Table 2-3 presents a comparison of the estimated data to the known reported actual <br /> annual totals. While the estimated numbers for the total year are not exactly the same, the <br /> resulting information of miles, hours and ridership was deemed adequate for a first <br /> approximation cost allocation. <br /> Table 2-3:April 2015 Vehicle Utilization Report Estimates <br /> Service Service Total <br /> rvice Ty Miles Hours Passengers <br /> Reported FY14 Fixed Route 61,964 2,557 16,690 <br /> Estimated FY15 Fixed Route 65,936 3,177 13,936 <br /> Percent Change 6.0% 19.5% -19.8% <br /> Reported FY14 Demand Response 252,659 13,778 46,829 <br /> Estimated FY15 Demand Response 259,532 11,524 39,806 <br /> Percent Change � 2.6% -19.6° 1-17.6% <br /> Reported FY14 Total 314,623 16,335 63,519 <br /> Estimated FY15 Total 325,468 14,702 53,742 <br /> Percent Change ■ 3.3% -11.1% -18.2% <br /> KFH <br /> NCDOT Orange County 32 <br /> Transit Assessment Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.