Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-11-2007-4q
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 12-11-2007
>
Agenda - 12-11-2007-4q
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 9:37:52 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:41:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/11/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4q
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20071211
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STRATEGIC GROWTH AND RURAL CONSERVATION PROGRAM <br />Draft (10.1.2007) <br />Value. The median land value per acre of recently developed parcels near-urban <br />areas is double that of recently developed rural parcels, $32,000 per acre compared to <br />$14,000 per acre (Table 2-2). This finding confirms that there are different housing <br />markets in the two areas, and that the SGRC Program will need to take into account <br />the inherent differences in land value when setting formulas to convert developable <br />acres from the rural areas to the near-urban areas. <br />The reason for using land value per acre, rather than simple land value or total value <br />per acre, is to assess the parcels on a level playing field, without taking into account the <br />size of the parcel, or the size or value of the house itself. . <br />Moreover, data in Table 2-2 show that the range and standard deviation of land values <br />in the near-urban areas is nearly four times that of the rural areas, indicating strong <br />fluctuations in value in the near-urban areas. Large differences in value are significant <br />when considering that the SGRC Program must take into account differences in land <br />value to correctly set formulas that will result in appropriate economic incentives. <br />To further investigate how much distance from a municipality influences land value, we <br />ran across-correlation between distance, parcel size, land value and total (land + <br />building) value per acre (Table 2-3). A value close to one in the table indicates that the <br />two variables are strongly influence each other, while a valve of less than 0.5 indicates <br />that the two variables are largely independent. A negative valve indicates that when <br />one variable increases, the other decreases. For example, land value per acre is <br />correlated with total value per acre very strongly, with a value of 0.95, indicating that <br />when land value is high, total valve is very likely to be high. The correlation values <br />between distance from municipal boundary and land value per acre and parcel size <br />do not show a strong correlation. This indicates that the variables are largely <br />independent, and land value is based on additional factors. <br />Table 2-3. Cross-Correlation of Key Variables for Recently Developed Parcels <br />Table 2-2. Land Value Statistics for Near-Urban vs. Rural Areas <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.