Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
STRATEGIC GROWTH AND RURAL CONSERVATION PROGRAM <br />Draft (10.1.2007) _ <br />Table 1-1. Contracted Service Process <br />Contracting Process <br />June 23,; 2004 BOCC authorizes'issuance of RFQ to professional planning consultants to;develop a- <br />countywide TDRprogram. <br />July 6; 2004 RFQ pasted on APA national and North t;arolina Chapter websites: <br />Aug. 13, 2004 Deadline forRFC2 responses: >=ive were received. <br />.Sept' &13, 2004 Interviews at he Governmental Service' £enter. <br />Qct 13;2004 Finalists (Freilich, Le'ltner & Carlisle/James NicholaslJ, J,,&G and t.oui5 BergerNNC' <br />Charlotte Urban Institute}are selected and addifional quesfions are sent:. <br />Nov. 22;;2004. B.OCCselects ouis Berger/UNC:Charlotte Urban lns6tute <br />Mar. 2005: BQGC approves consultant contracYfor Phases I' and ll, <br />June 23;:2005 BOCC appoints SGRC Task Force. <br />June 27, 2006 BOCC receives the consultant's SGRC FeasibilityStudy draftreportand affirmsthe.- <br />reconimeridatiarrof tt-e'SGRC'fask Farce that'the' pracess;of designing a SGRC program <br />shoald`go forward. <br />Sept: 19, 2406' BQCC approves`contractwithLauis BergerNNCCharlotte Urban Ins6tute;taconduct <br />Phase:Ill of the SGRt program development. <br />Nov 2; 2006 BOCC approves budget forPhase III of consul#ant contract: <br />Dec. 't9, 2006 Orange County:staff give consultant formal notice to proceed with Phase -III. <br />Table 1-2. Program Development Process <br />SGRC Prngtam Deuelbpment`Process <br />Phase I and Phase Il were both completed in June 2006, with deliverables accepted by BOCC in October 2006. <br />Reliverables can pe;found at http:Jlwwvuca.arange.nc.uslplanninglTDR files~ndexaitmL <br /> :Available: New fo <br /> Delivered on web NG <br />Phase w i3ackground Research and Data Gathering <br />A. Property values and market trends.analysis: Oct 2006 Yes No <br />B. Graft Feaslbdity Decision Flowchart Oct. 2006 Yes No <br />C: Public Engagemen# Process Flan. OcG 2006 Yes No: <br />D': Legal assessment`: Oct; 2006 Yes Yes: <br />;E: Case studies of ofherTOWSGRC programs Oct. 2006. Yes. Yes: <br />F:. Key stakeholder interviews Oct: 2006 Yes Yes: <br />Phase II -:Feasibility Study and.Concept. Plan <br />A. Assess'Sending Area potential Oct. 200ti Yes Yes: <br />B. Assess Receiving Area po#ential Qct 2006 Yes. Yes <br />C: Determine overall economic viablity Oct 200fi. Yes Yes <br />d::Assess issues, constraints and opportunities Oct. 2006 Yes:: :Yes <br />(legal, admlrnstrative; financial.)- <br />E: Finalize:Feasibility,Decisian Flowchart Oct. 200i% Yes; Yes <br />F : Identify impacts of SGRC on existing county programs' Oct. 2006 Yes: Yes <br />Phase,lli - Program Design and mplementation Plaq <br />A, Program Design Options Ongoing Not yef ;Yes <br />.Administrative:DesignOptions <br />B. Ongoing Not,yet Yes. <br />, <br />C. Implementation Plen Ongoing Not yei; Yes: <br />D. Ordinance Developmenf Upcoming Not yet; Yes <br />Orange County, North Cazolina <br />