Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
14 <br /> 1 level of action in order to insure consistency, not only with our ordinance, but with State <br /> 2 law. Pat and I are here to answer any questions you have. Thank you. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Chair McKee: Are there any questions either on the amendment— not the amendment <br /> 5 —the abstract, and the attachments; or in the instructions that Mr. Harvey just gave us? <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Commissioner Dorosin: So all these motions need to be made individually, we can't <br /> 8 lump any of them together, in the interest of expediting this process? <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Michael Harvey: I am going to say that this Board can certainly make a motion to <br /> 11 approve the Planning Board recommendation as it relates to, section 2.2, etc. That can <br /> 12 be one motion. And I will also suggest sir, that you should defer to the County Attorney, <br /> 13 but I would strongly urge you to make independent motions of findings on section 5.3.2 <br /> 14 (a) which is consistency with a con plan, promoting or— excuse me — insuring property <br /> 15 value and what not. I think those needn't to be separately. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Commissioner Dorosin: Consigliore, do you concur? <br /> 18 <br /> 19 John Roberts: I do. Recent case law— or within the last several years — has leaned <br /> 20 towards more specificity from Boards making these types of quasi-judicial decisions. So <br /> 21 1 do recommend each one. It's true, there's been no opposition voiced for this, and so <br /> 22 an appeal is unlikely. But I believe the Applicant would be more comfortable if the Board <br /> 23 did go through each motion individually to establish a record. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Chair McKee: And, as Chair, I would ask that we do take each — I realize it will take <br /> 26 longer— but I would ask that we would take each one of them individually as we go <br /> 27 through. It'd be less chance of either missing one, or misstating one. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Commissioner Dorosin: That's fine. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Chair McKee: Other questions? Seeing no other questions, I would again reiterate <br /> 32 that once—that I will, in a moment, ask for a motion to close the Public Hearing; and <br /> 33 once that happens, there cannot be any other questions. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 5. A motion will need to be made to close the public hearing. <br /> 36 A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded by <br /> 37 Commissioner Burroughs to close the public hearing. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 40 NOTE—once this is done, Planning Staff cannot answer questions or provide <br /> 41 additional detail. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 6. The BOCC will first need to take action on the Special Use Permit findings of fact. The <br /> 44 findings of fact have been organized per relevant UDO section to aid in making motions <br /> 45 to approve or deny. The cadence on taking action should be as follows <br /> 46 <br /> 47 a. A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded by Commissioner <br /> 48 Burroughs to approve and adopt the recommendation of the Planning Board <br /> 49 concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of Section(s) 2.2 and <br />