Agenda - 10-06-2015 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

69 AND • A lack of competent material evidence in the record demonstrating the applicant did not comply with the UDO. If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a), the Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a). prrrf(�(,°,1 ith (.;(,°,don 5,3 (A) ( ) (fir) of°th(., UDO in that ter(.,; will maintain rofr(;vrrfrr(., rr1vr-,,on1fgu.rrru.rs prop(.:rrty, This rrrrrtfon is bas(..ed on rrrrrkrrial and into th(.,, rr(.r°rrrrd of th(..s(. err°rrr�°,� elf ;�r, fmdt'i ing- NOTE — the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) this list must be read verbatim so it is in the record. • Application package and testimony including: o Impact Analysis completed by Everett `Vic' Knight on how the project complied with the UDO. • Staff testimony and abstract package from May 26, 2015 quarterly public hearing. • Planning Board packet from July 1, 2015 regular meeting. AND • A lack of competent material evidence in the record demonstrating the applicant did not comply with the UDO. If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b), the Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b). fff, Motion finding ing is or is not in lh(., rr.r°rrrrd th(.', is in harrriony with th(.,, arr(.,a in frfr°,h it is to b(.,.; lo(,a1(..ef and th(, is in