|
68
<br /> NOTE — if the motion is to reject the individual making the motion will need to
<br /> provide some explanation justifying the finding that the applicant has not
<br /> established, through competent material and substantial evidence, the project is in
<br /> compliance with Section 5.8.4 (B) of the UDO.
<br /> A rnotion will to b(.,, rnad(., r(..garding c,,ornplianc,,(..: with S(..(,-,,don 53,2 (A) (2) of
<br /> Ordinanc,,(..; as 1`61lows
<br /> (NOTE — Whomever makes the motion will have to cite the 'evidence' in the
<br /> record utilized justifying the motion to approve or deny. Attachment 5 contains
<br /> the recommendations of the Planning Board including the evidence utilized to
<br /> reach the conclusion. This 'evidence' must be spelled out explicitly by the
<br /> Commissioner making the motion.
<br /> If the motion is to deny then the Commissioner making the motion will have to
<br /> spell out explicitly the evidence within the record utilized to justify a negative
<br /> finding):
<br /> i, Motion linding is or is snot in lh(. r(.,;(,-,ord
<br /> proJ(..(,-,,1 with S(..(,-,,don 53,2 (A) (2) (a) ofth(., UDO in that th(.,,
<br /> will maintain and prornot(.. th(.,, pt.iblic,, h(.,,alth, sal'(.,ty and g(..iu.ral
<br /> w(..11'an.., if loc,,at(..d wh(.,.r(.,.: propos(..d and d(.w(..1op(..d and op(.,.rat(.,:d a(,-,,(,-,,ording
<br /> to th(.,,plan as st,ibrrdtt(.,,d,
<br /> This motion is bas(..d on rnak.rial and into th(.,,
<br /> r(.,.(,-ord ofth(..s(. proc,,( (..6ngs, inc,,ft,iding-
<br /> NOTE — the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If
<br /> the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find
<br /> compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a) this list must be read verbatim
<br /> so it is in the record.
<br /> • Application package and testimony including:
<br /> • Biological Inventory completed by The Catena Group;
<br /> • Forest Stewardship Plan completed by Kelly Douglass;
<br /> • Impact Analysis completed by Everett `Vic' Knight
<br /> • Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) completed by
<br /> SEPI Engineering
<br /> • State Clearinghouse comments
<br /> on how the project complied with the UDO.
<br /> • Staff testimony and abstract package from May 26, 2015
<br /> quarterly public hearing.
<br /> • Planning Board packet from July 1, 2015 regular meeting.
<br />
|