Orange County NC Website
Attachment 3: Orange County Combined Project List (Carry-over and New) 7 <br /> Orange County Combined Project List (Carry-Over and New) <br /> Carry-Over Projects: <br /> Map ID Project <br /> 1 Buckhorn Road widening from U.S. 70 to West Ten Road <br /> 2 NC 54 widening from Orange Grove Road to NC 119 in Alamance County <br /> 3 NC 54 widening from Old Fayetteville Road to Orange Grove Road OR just operational <br /> improvements* <br /> 4 Intersection Improvements at NC 54 and Old Fayetteville Road (DCHC MPO planning area)* <br /> 5 Intersection Improvements at NC 54 and Neville Road (DCHC MPO planning area)* <br /> 6 Intersection Improvements at NC 54 and Dodsons Crossroads* <br /> 7 Intersection Improvements at NC 54 and Orange Grove Road* <br /> *The NC 54 widening project from Old Fayetteville Road to Orange Grove Road is being split into multiple <br /> segments in cooperation between NCDOT Division 7 staff, which favored keeping the project as an added <br /> capacity project (as it was shown in the past) and the Town of Carrboro, which favored changing the project to <br /> one involving only operational improvements. This allows TARPO to consider both potential options and see <br /> how each scores to determine competitiveness for funding. <br /> New Projects: <br /> Map ID Project <br /> 8 Efland-Cedar Grove Road modernization project (Highland Farm Road to north of Carr <br /> Store Road) <br /> 9 Old Greensboro Road modernization project (Jones Ferry Road to Alamance County line) <br /> 10 Orange Grove Road/Buckhorn Road modernization project (Dairyland Road to West Ten <br /> Road) <br /> Projects Endorsed by BOCC at June 2, 2015, meeting that will not be submitted for scoring: <br /> 1) Orange Grove Road Paved Shoulders (From NC 54 to Arthur Minnis Road) <br /> 2) Dairyland Road Paved Shoulders <br /> 3) Orange Grove Road/Dodsons Crossroads Paved Shoulders <br /> These projects were not recommended by the TARPO Prioritization subcommittee because <br /> they are categorized as bicycle infrastructure projects that would require the County to <br /> provide a 20% local match and to administer the implementation of the project. <br />