Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-03-2007-6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 12-03-2007
>
Agenda - 12-03-2007-6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 10:51:53 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:36:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/3/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
ORD-2007-221 - Animal Ordinance Civil Penalty and Fee Increases
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On the basis of this .study, staff developed the following recommended changes, doing so in <br />concert with the Animal Services Advisory Board, which formally approved these <br />recommendations. <br /> New Amount Previous Amount <br />Failure to Vaccinate a ainst Rabies $200 $100 <br />Failure to License $200 $50 <br />Mistreatment $200 $50 <br />Public Nuisance Violations $50, $100, $200, $300, $400 $25, $50, $100, $150, $200 <br />The adjustment of these amounts requires the amendment of section 21 of the ordinance, <br />which has been prepared by the Office of the County Attorney, on the basis of a public hearing. <br />The proposed effective date of these changes is July 1, 2008. <br />As can be seen from the proposed ordinance amendment, and the related proposal to amend <br />the Animal Control Collection Policy, a change in language from "civil penalty" to "fee" is being <br />recommended in several instances as well. These include a failure to vaccinate against rabies; <br />a failure to wear a rabies tag; a failure to license; and a failure to allow a required permit <br />inspection. The rationale for these changes is that there should be a fee to recover some of the <br />additional costs that are incurred when pet owners are not in compliance with the County's <br />Animal Control ordinances. <br />The public relations plan has been developed by a work group of staff, and an earlier version <br />with a shorter schedule was formally approved by the ASAB. The outreach plan stresses the <br />theme of responsible pet ownership and the benefits of complying with the Animal Ordinance. <br />The outreach includes four major components organized around these themes: a media <br />release, a flyer, public service announcements, and display advertisements. Outreach in <br />accordance with this plan is intended to ensure that individual pet owners and other County <br />residents are all aware of changes in the amount of civil penalties and fees and their rationale in <br />advance of the actual changes. <br />A first reading of this proposal occurred at the November 15, 2007, BOCC meeting, and the <br />proposal was approved by a vote of 4 to 1. It is proposed for final approval on second reading <br />by the BOCC at this December 3, 2007 regular meeting. As directed by the BOCC in the action <br />it took on November 15th, the education and outreach period has been extended to six months, <br />beginning on January 1, 2008 and running until the effective date of change on July 1, 2008. <br />Given discussion at the initial reading, staff is making some other adjustments to ensure that <br />the public is adequately. informed of and prepared for any changes. Staff is reviewing the <br />Animal Services webpage to ensure that it is as accessible, clear and user-friendly as possible, <br />especially with regard to animal control requirements and procedures. Also, staff has contacted <br />kennel permit owners to notify them of the proposed changes and second reading. <br />Both the ordinances themselves and related civil penalties and fees are designed to improve <br />the safety and welfare of not only animals, but human members of the County. This is no less <br />true with respect to various public nuisances (for example, barking or unconfined dogs) than the <br />vaccination of dogs and cats against rabies, though the latter is certainly accented by high <br />numbers of confirmed rabies cases in recent years in Orange County as well as the state. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.