Orange County NC Website
Michael Harvey said the comments from OWASA are valued but the actions of the State <br /> are beyond the County's control. He said the County has achieved a reasonable solution to the <br /> problem and puts the responsibility on the property owner to come up with a solution. He said <br /> there may be exemptions to the State's potential changes as well as studies that the County can <br /> complete to show the importance of restrictive stream buffers. <br /> Michael Harvey said even though the State may modify the Stream Buffer Program it <br /> does not invalidate the benefits of this process. <br /> Michael Harvey said he has heard Commissioner Jacobs express concern that while this <br /> may have universal application for protected watersheds there is concern that tinkering with the <br /> impervious surface limit in the critical watersheds should be prohibited. He asked for both the <br /> BOCC and the Planning Board to consider this comment. <br /> Chair McKee said he is concerned with the odd shaped lots that have been developed <br /> due to the configuration of the land. He said some have very long driveways that eat up the <br /> impervious surface. He said he feels this option would allow people to build a larger house, <br /> garage, or some other out building on their property which is currently difficult to do. <br /> Chair McKee said one of the emails received concerned the ownership of a ten acre <br /> property with a 1.8 or 2.3 percent impervious surface, which is well under the 6 percent <br /> allowance. He said this particular configuration is affected by the way the developer assigned <br /> the impervious surface and puts extreme limits on what a person can build on their property. <br /> Michael Harvey said the Board has asked staff to look into whether the Subdivision <br /> Ordinance needs to be amended to include a mandatory minimum percentage of impervious for <br /> every lot, thus preventing developers from robbing Peter to pay Paul. <br /> Chair McKee said the matter must be reviewed thoroughly. <br /> Michael Harvey said both Planning and Erosion Control staff meet with individuals <br /> seeking to develop property to try to identify alternative means to develop driveways. He said <br /> one example is geoweb, a hard composite plastic that is buried subterranean and can support <br /> the weight of a vehicle. He said it is not counted as impervious and would allow developers to <br /> address the specific instance to which Chair McKee referred. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked if staff, with regard to a maintenance agreement, is <br /> suggesting that the homeowner pay for the additional inspections. She asked if such funds <br /> would cover the additional staff required to conduct the inspections. <br /> Michael Harvey said the funds could supplement the need for additional staff. He said <br /> different options are being considered. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said ask the Planning Board or staff to consider giving home <br /> owners up front notification about the repairs, their costs and the exact responsibility the home <br /> owner incurs. <br /> Michael Harvey said currently the Erosion Control staff clearly details the operations <br /> agreement and does a detailed walk through of all expectations. He said cost is not currently <br /> discussed but estimates could be provided. <br />