Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-08-2015 - C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 09-08-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 09-08-2015 - C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2015 10:33:29 AM
Creation date
8/31/2015 10:18:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/8/2015
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.2
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-08-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
54 <br /> (3) Relevant information needed to show compliance with the general and specific <br /> standards governing the Special Use (See Articles 5 and 6). <br /> (4) For Class A Special Uses 26 copies of the site plan, and for Class B Special <br /> Uses 10 copies of the site plan, prepared by a registered North Carolina land <br /> surveyor, landscape architect, architect, or engineer, which shall contain the <br /> information listed in Section 2.5. <br /> (5) If the application involves a Preliminary Subdivision Plat, 26 copies of the Plat <br /> prepared in accordance with Section 7.14 shall be provided. <br /> (6) A list of all parcels located within 500 feet of the subject parcel and the name and <br /> address of each property owner, as currently listed in the Orange County tax <br /> records. <br /> (7) Elevations of all structures proposed to be used in the development. <br /> (8) For Class A Special Uses 26 copies and for Class B Special Uses 10 copies of <br /> the Environmental Assessment and/or Environmental Impact Statement, if <br /> required by Section 6.16. <br /> (9) Method of disposal of trees, limbs, stumps and construction debris associated <br /> with the permitted activity, which shall be by some method other than open <br /> burning. <br /> (10) Statement from the applicant indicating the anticipated development schedule for <br /> the build-out of the project. <br /> (11) Statement from the applicant in justification of any request for vesting for a period <br /> of more than two years (five years maximum). <br /> 2.7.4 Staff Review <br /> (A) The Planning Director shall cause an analysis to be made of the application by qualified <br /> representatives of the County and other agencies or officials as appropriate. <br /> (1) Applications for agricultural support enterprise uses located within the Rural <br /> Buffer land use classification, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map of the <br /> adopted Comprehensive Plan, shall be forwarded to the County's Agricultural <br /> Preservation Board for review and comment. <br /> (a) The Agricultural Preservation Board shall have 30 calendar days to <br /> provide comments. If comments are not received within this timeframe, <br /> the application review process shall not be delayed. <br /> (b) For purposes of this subsection, agricultural support enterprise uses <br /> shall be defined as those permitted in the ASE-CZ zoning district, as <br /> detailed within Section 5.2.3 of this Ordinance. <br /> (B) The Planning Director shall submit the analysis to the Board of County Commissioners <br /> and the Planning Board, in the case of Class A Special Uses, or the Board of Adjustment, <br /> in the case of Class B Special Uses. <br /> (C) The appropriate Board reviewing the application shall receive and enter the analysis into <br /> evidence during the public hearing. The analysis shall be subject to examination by all <br /> interested parties and the Planning Director shall be subject to cross-examination <br /> regarding the analysis. <br /> (D) zo <br /> 20 The Staff Attorney has suggested this language be removed. In instances where Planning staff is asked for an <br /> opinion or asked questions about the findings of fact, having this language in the UDO could be problematic <br /> because it could create a large gray area. (Section 1.4 of the UDO allows the Planning Director to designate other <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.