Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
66 <br /> NOTE — the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If <br /> the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) this list must be read verbatim <br /> so it is in the record. <br /> • Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application <br /> and site plan, presented at the May 26, 2015 Quarterly Public <br /> Hearing. <br /> • Staff testimony on the project and its compliance with <br /> various provisions of the UDO. <br /> • Applicant testimony from Mr. Thomas Hester, a licensed real <br /> estate appraiser, and Mr. Richard Kirkland, a licensed real <br /> estate appraiser, on how the project complied with the UDO. <br /> This included a real estate evaluation indicating the project <br /> would not have an impact on adjacent property value. <br /> And <br /> • A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered <br /> into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance <br /> with established standards. <br /> If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b), the <br /> Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is <br /> absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the <br /> claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) <br /> (2) (b). <br /> iii. Motion finding there is or is not sufficient evidence in the record the <br /> project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) of the UDO in that the use <br /> is in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in <br /> compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as <br /> embodied in these regulations and in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> This motion is based on competent material and evidence entered into the <br /> record of these proceedings, including: <br /> NOTE — the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If <br /> the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) this list must be read verbatim so <br /> it is in the record. <br /> • Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application <br /> and site plan, presented at the May 26, 2015 Quarterly Public <br /> Hearing. <br />