Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 5b - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

9 42 1 tracks. I think if the houses aren't affected, I think the bigger tracks of land are not going to be 2 affected. So I was really focusing on the residential uses. 3 4 Pete Hallenbeck: And, of course, your report is entered as evidence. So the Planning Board 5 will be able to review that, correct. 6 7 Tom Hester: Good. Thank you. 8 9 Pete Hallenbeck: And I think we have a question from a Commissioner. 10 11 Commissioner Rich: I have a question. I think this is possibly for Mr. Harvey. Can you just 12 run through the process so we're talking about a portion of this property that's as Commissioner 13 Dorosin asked, is staying one property, it's not being broken down into any or into two parcels. 14 What is the process for development of the other part of the property? 15 16 Chair McKee: We have to follow the procedure. I'm sorry. You'll get a chance to speak. 17 18 Michael Harvey: One of the conditions that'll be associated with the Special Use Permit is, 19 obviously, it'll have to go through a subdivision process. As this will be an exempt subdivision — 20 meaning it'll be larger than 10 acres—will be exempt. And what that translates to is that the 21 County Planning Staff will actually have to verify that the boundaries of the new lot here actually 22 comply with any approved site plan for the Special Use Permit. But it will be reviewed and 23 approved through the exempt process. Meaning, we're not going to do anything else other than 24 verify its compliance with the SUP. As far as development of the southern parcel of the 25 property, it will allowed — be allowed to develop consistent with its current zoning. The issuance 26 of the SUP has no bearing on this potential parcel of property. So, for example, if it was an 27 undeveloped parcel, could they develop a single family residence on it? The answer is yes. 28 They would have to go through the site plan review process or the plot plan review process as 29 spelled out in section 2.4 of the Unified Development Ordinance, consistent with the building 30 permit application. 31 32 Patrick Mallet: I would just like to add to that. The revisions that they submitted today, clarify 33 that there's a line that defines the limits of the Special Use Permit. 34 35 Commissioner Rich: Sorry, I didn't get a chance to read that until it got set down. 36 37 Patrick Mallet: Understood. 38 39 Commissioner Rich: I wasn't in my easy chair, checking it out. 40 41 Patrick Mallet: It defines the future lot line and the limits of the Special Use Permits. So, 1 42 think, in this case, it's very well specified where they intend to locate the solar arrays. And 1 43 would add —this is a little bit unique, in the sense that you would typically see a lease 44 arrangement. This is a purchase. And as a result the purchase will create a specifically defined 45 property boundary area through the subdivision process. 46 47 Commissioner Rich: Thank you. 48 49 Pete Hallenbeck: Alright. We have a number of people who signed up to speak on this. What 50 I'd like to do at this point is have anyone who wishes to speak on this come up and get sworn in. 51 And then we'll listen to what you have to say. Do we have anyone here who wishes to speak?