Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2016 12:02:22 PM
Creation date
8/31/2015 9:48:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/1/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-01-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
ORD-2015-021 (Deferred) UDO amendment for Temporary Health Care Structures
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29 <br /> Approved 7/1/2015 <br /> 246 <br /> 247 Paul Guthrie: Are you going to call the vote. <br /> 248 <br /> 249 Vote 10 to 2 (Paul Guthrie/Lydia Wegman*) <br /> 250 <br /> 251 Paul Guthrie: I didn't like it. <br /> 252 <br /> 253 Pete Hallenbeck: Motion to approve the amendment as in the packet UDO amendments. <br /> 254 <br /> 255 James Lea: What page is that on? <br /> 256 <br /> 257 Pete Hallenbeck: 73 attachement 3. <br /> 258 <br /> 259 Motion by Buddy Hartley. Seconded by Bryant Warren. <br /> 260 <br /> 261 Pete Hallenbeck: This is the section in red we discussed where it says the submittal requirements and so <br /> 262 forth. This document is very much driven by the state law. <br /> 263 <br /> 264 Ashley Moncado: Yes <br /> 265 <br /> 266 Vote: 9 to 3 (Lydia Wegman, Lisa Stuckey and Paul Guthrie) <br /> 267 <br /> 268 Pete Hallenbeck: Paul would you like to say anything. <br /> 269 <br /> 270 Paul Guthrie: Bad law, we can deal with the issue without it. <br /> 271 <br /> 272 Lisa Stuckey: I'm voting no simply because I don't think we have all the facts. This is something worth <br /> 273 asking the attorney whether it could be made less restrictive to include nonrelatives to be in compliance <br /> 274 with other areas of our UDO to allow husband and wife to be in there together so I just feel like I would <br /> 275 rather let the attorney guide us, something for county commissioners to ask the attorney. <br /> 276 <br /> 277 Lydia Wegman: I agree with Lisa. I'm concerned about approving just this piece without having the other <br /> 278 pieces. We've talked about going forward with it so it's clear that we are presenting a whole package of <br /> 279 options to people who are facing this situation. We may need to follow up on Lisa's suggestion and we <br /> 280 many need to approve this but I would like to see if there is a way at the same time to approve something <br /> 281 that is broader and meets the needs of many more people in the county. <br /> 282 <br /> 283 ****** <br /> *Red text was added to the June 3,2015 minutes to accurately present the vote regarding this item on July 2,2015 following Planning Board adoption. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.