Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2015 8:42:45 AM
Creation date
8/31/2015 8:39:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/1/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-01-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> 1 Commissioner Jacobs clarified the water and sewer work being discussed is in the <br /> 2 central portion of Orange County. <br /> 3 Commissioner Rich said residents in Chapel Hill believe Hillsborough is in the northern <br /> 4 part of the County. <br /> 5 Paul Laughton said the final portion of this section of the CIP is the Buckhorn-Mebane <br /> 6 EDD. He referred to pages 75 and 76. He said this project has been moved back to Year 3 of <br /> 7 the CIP and totals about $2.8 million. <br /> 8 Craig Benedict said this is the area between I-85, I-40 and the railway area just to the <br /> 9 north. He said this area is sometimes shown to developers who have interest in rail, but one <br /> 10 difficulty is the need for an access road on Buckhorn Road across from Industrial Drive. He <br /> 11 added that all projects are being reviewed and refined in order to make things as marketable as <br /> 12 possible. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Solid Waste <br /> 15 Paul Laughton reviewed the following information from the abstract regarding Sanitation: <br /> 16 The current FY 2014-15 funds of approximately $3.1 million includes improvements to <br /> 17 the Eubanks Road Solid Waste Convenience Center (SWCC), including the relocation of the <br /> 18 main landfill entrance and scales from the south side to the north side of Eubanks Road; funds <br /> 19 of$296,035 in Year 1 (FY 2015-16) for the replacement of a front end loader; Year 2 (FY 2016- <br /> 20 17) includes $519,750 for SWCC improvements at the High Rock Road site; and Year 3 (FY <br /> 21 2017-18) includes $393,750 for SWCC improvements at the Ferguson Road site. <br /> 22 Commissioner Rich asked if the Eubanks SWCC will be closed while it is being up fitted. <br /> 23 Paul Laughton said yes. <br /> 24 Commissioner Rich asked where the employees from the Eubanks SWCC will be <br /> 25 moved. <br /> 26 Gayle Wilson, Solid Waste Management Director, said there will be a temporary site set <br /> 27 up with reduced services. He said he plans to have an abstract with more details available for <br /> 28 the June 2 BOCC meeting. <br /> 29 Commissioner Rich said she was at the Eubanks SWCC this week and it was very busy. <br /> 30 She commended the employees and said these upgrades are very important. <br /> 31 Gayle Wilson said it is helpful to have employees work consistently at the same location, <br /> 32 as they are able to get to know the community members. He said the new site will be able to <br /> 33 handle a larger number of customers more efficiently and safely. <br /> 34 Commissioner Jacobs asked if the fees charged to the public cover operating expenses <br /> 35 or operating and capital expenses. <br /> 36 Gayle Wilson said the new fee covers about 35%of the sanitation budget including <br /> 37 expenses for contribution to the reserve for equipment replacement. <br /> 38 Commissioner Jacobs asked if the debt incurred for these upgrades will be paid off over <br /> 39 time. <br /> 40 Gayle Wilson said yes. <br /> 41 Commissioner Price asked if the statement "modernize the High Rock SWCC" could be <br /> 42 clarified. <br /> 43 Gayle Wilson said there was a model endorsed by the Board of County Commissioners <br /> 44 where there would be a mix of District Centers and Neighborhood Centers. He said that Walnut <br /> 45 Grove and Eubanks were proposed as District Centers thus larger, offering a wider array of <br /> 46 services, longer hours, etc. He said Neighborhood Centers were proposed to be smaller with <br /> 47 more limited services and perhaps more limited hours. He said having the two larger service <br /> 48 centers and the smaller neighborhood centers allows for costs to be moderated while still <br /> 49 insuring access to services throughout the County. <br /> 50 Commissioner Price reiterated her question about the High Rock SWCC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.