Orange County NC Website
2 <br /> 1 Orange County Partnership to End Homelessness <br /> 2 2015 Plan to End Homelessness <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Orange County Partnership to End Homelessness <br /> 5 • Orange County Ten-Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness (2007) <br /> 6 • Coalition of housing and service providers, local government and community members <br /> 7 working together to end and prevent homelessness in Orange County <br /> 8 • Leadership Team and workgroups <br /> 9 o Housing <br /> 10 o Employment <br /> 11 o Services <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Overarching Goals <br /> 14 Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness (2010): <br /> 15 1. Set a path to ending all types of homelessness; <br /> 16 2. Finish the job of ending chronic homelessness by 2017; <br /> 17 3. Prevent and end homelessness among veterans by 2015 (2016 in NC); <br /> 18 4. Prevent and end homelessness for families, youth and children by 2020. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Best Practices <br /> 21 • 2009 HEARTH Act: <br /> 22 Homeless Emergency Assistance & Rapid Transition to Housing <br /> 23 • Homelessness System: <br /> 24 1. Emergency Shelter <br /> 25 2. Rapid Re-Housing (including services) <br /> 26 3. Permanent Supportive Housing (for disabled, including services) <br /> 27 • Housing First: housing is health care <br /> 28 • ENDING vs. MANAGING homelessness: trampoline vs. sticky safety net <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Chair McKee asked if there is an alternative for when residents are unable to comply <br /> 31 with facility rules and regulations, or their own treatment plan. <br /> 32 Jamie Rohe said people are not required to follow treatment plans, but treatment plans <br /> 33 are available to them. She said there may be a disabled person with a mental health diagnosis <br /> 34 plus a drug and alcohol addiction. She said previous thinking followed a "carrot and stick" <br /> 35 approach; where the carrot was the housing and the stick was the treatment plan. She said it <br /> 36 has been found that when people are in permanent housing, and are offered the option to <br /> 37 choose or deny services, they are more likely to accept services offered. She said not <br /> 38 everyone takes advantage of such treatment; however, the vast majority show improvements, <br /> 39 such as drinking less. She added that there are other societal benefits, such as a reduction in <br /> 40 trips to the Emergency room, the involvement of Police, the use of emergency shelters, etc. <br /> 41 Chair McKee asked if the behavior of a small subset, that does not take advantage of <br /> 42 the treatment offered, is being enabling by the removal of a consequence; such as the loss of <br /> 43 housing. <br /> 44 Jamie Rohe said she is not a Social Worker, and cannot speak with the authority of a <br /> 45 front line case worker. She said it is her understanding from those who are experts in the field, <br /> 46 that a person who resists treatment would be more likely to continue abuse drugs and alcohol, <br /> 47 and not seek mental health treatment, while living on the streets; and therefore at much greater <br /> 48 risk of death, than if they were to continue to receive housing. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Funding and Data <br />