Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2015 8:42:45 AM
Creation date
8/31/2015 8:39:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/1/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-01-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> 1 $180,000 change two CIP Projects $180,000 <br /> 2 Board of County Commissioners Compensation $ 24,500 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Commissioner Dorosin referred to an email he sent earlier in the day regarding pre-trial <br /> 5 programs and their potential move to the Sheriff' Office. He said his email voiced concerns <br /> 6 passed on to him from various stakeholders regarding this change. He said further discussion <br /> 7 by the Board seems warranted. He said the Manager has proposed continuing the contracts <br /> 8 and moving the administrative components to the County Manager's office. He said he would <br /> 9 endorse this proposal. He asked if the topic could continue to be discussed over the next six <br /> 10 months. He said concerns arise as the judicial process is an adversarial one and the Sheriff's <br /> 11 Office is affiliated with one side of said process. He said having services moved from a neutral <br /> 12 non-profit to the Sheriff's Office requires careful planning and forethought. <br /> 13 Commissioner Pelissier said there was a recommendation that the Drug Court and pre- <br /> 14 trial services be brought in house, per the jail alternatives work group. She said this raises two <br /> 15 questions: bringing it in house to begin with and where to place it in house. She said the <br /> 16 Manager recommended that these both go to Sheriff's Office and be reviewed on an annual <br /> 17 basis. She said she is unsure whether contracts are needed or if having a position is <br /> 18 preferable. <br /> 19 Commissioner Jacobs said the Manager recommended these services to come under <br /> 20 the Sheriff, since there was difficulty coordinating with outside agencies. He said he feels it is <br /> 21 generous of the Sheriff to be willing to take these services on, but understands the potential <br /> 22 issues given the adversarial nature of the judicial system. He agreed that the Board should <br /> 23 have a further discussion, and as an interim measure to put it under the auspices of the <br /> 24 Manager. <br /> 25 Bonnie Hammersley said the Recommended Budget did include the recommendation of <br /> 26 moving Pretrial Services and the Drug Court to the Sheriff's Office. She said this <br /> 27 recommendation came from concerns raised by various departments and members of the Jail <br /> 28 Alternatives Workgroup. She said there could be a conflict of interest with the entity that <br /> 29 oversees these services. She said it is not uncommon for these programs to be in a jail. She <br /> 30 said in order to protect the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), she is recommending to <br /> 31 review this annually as a part of the budget ordinance, and for BOCC to choose an entity to <br /> 32 oversee these programs. She said she has also heard from some concerned members of the <br /> 33 legal community. <br /> 34 Bonnie Hammersley said her email today which stated: "In response to the concerns <br /> 35 that have been raised by some of the stakeholders of the Pre-trial Services change in the <br /> 36 budget, I would offer an option of continuing the contracts but transferring administration of the <br /> 37 contracts to the County Manager's office to allow the opportunity for input from <br /> 38 stakeholders. This option could also apply to the Drug Court contract that was included in the <br /> 39 budget initiative to transfer to the Sheriff office," was an interim solution in her office for <br /> 40 oversight and evaluation these programs and then to report back to the Board of <br /> 41 Commissioners. <br /> 42 Commissioner Dorosin said the Manager's proposed compromise would address all of <br /> 43 the concerns. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded by Commissioner Rich that <br /> 46 Pretrial Services and Drug Court continue as contracts, but transferring administration of those <br /> 47 contracts to the County Manager's office, to allow for input from stakeholders and also for <br /> 48 continued evaluation of where the program should ultimately end up. <br /> 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.