Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> 1 June 25, 2015). Also, includes funds of$169,575 in Year 1 (FY 2015-16) for the replacement of <br /> 2 outdated ADA voting equipment, as part of an IT Governance Council initiative. <br /> 3 • Life Safety—ADA (CIP page 35) — includes moving $60,000 from Year 2 to Year 1 (FY <br /> 4 2015-16) for elevator improvements at the Historic Courthouse. <br /> 5 • Conservation Easements (CIP page 48) — includes additional County funds of$125,000 <br /> 6 and matching State/Federal grant funds and landowner donations of$125,000 beginning in <br /> 7 Year 1 (FY 2015-16) and continuing each year throughout the CIP. Due to the County's <br /> 8 increase in funds, staff recommends debt financing instead of Pay-As-You-Go funding. <br /> 9 • CIP Plan Summary(CIP pages 6-7), County Capital Projects Summary(CIP pages 16- <br /> 10 17), and County Capital Operating Impact Summary (CIP pages 18-19) —to reflect the revised <br /> 11 County Capital Projects listed above. <br /> 12 Note: A revised County Debt Service and Debt Capacity— General Fund Only (CIP pages 133- <br /> 13 134) affected by these revised projects was provided at the June 9 work session, along with <br /> 14 information related to Debt Capacity and Debt Affordability. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Proprietary Project <br /> 17 • Solid Waste - Sanitation (CIP page 81) — removes $296,035 from Year 1 (FY 2015-16) <br /> 18 for the replacement of a front end loader. Solid Waste Department was able to purchase this in <br /> 19 the current fiscal year with unanticipated funds within the department's budget. <br /> 20 • Solid Waste Capital Projects Summary(CIP page 79) —to reflect the revised Sanitation <br /> 21 Capital Project listed above. <br /> 22 Paul Laughton said at the Commissioners' places are the revised County Debt Service <br /> 23 and Debt Capacity, with changes highlighted in yellow. He said on the second page of the <br /> 24 handout, in bold print, it is shown that the County does stay under the 15% Debt Service policy. <br /> 25 Paul Laughton said on the second page of his hand out, one can see a bump in 2017-18 <br /> 26 and 2018-19. He said those are the years that revenue sources must be closely reviewed. He <br /> 27 said the County would still need to look at additional revenue sources and tax revenue <br /> 28 implications to pay for this additional debt. He said the County may have to look at raising <br /> 29 taxes to cover the debt in these latter years. He said though the capacity looks okay now the <br /> 30 projected debt service payments going forward need to be studied closely. <br /> 31 Commissioner Dorosin asked if these numbers include a potential bond. <br /> 32 Paul Laughton said no. <br /> 33 Commissioner Dorosin said as a bond could change the debt service picture in a <br /> 34 negative way, he would like to see this information. <br /> 35 Commissioner Jacobs said as the Board pursues the discussion of the bond package, it <br /> 36 would be good to have a clear picture of the debt capacity so the Board can make informed <br /> 37 decisions. <br /> 38 Chair McKee asked for clarification regarding the projected annual debt. He asked if <br /> 39 this pertained to affordability, and not capacity. <br /> 40 Paul Laughton said yes. <br /> 41 Chair McKee asked if the bond goes on the ballot and passes in 2016 when would the <br /> 42 debt payments begin. <br /> 43 Paul Laughton said the payments would begin one year after the first debt is issued. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Adjournment <br /> 46 A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Dorosin to <br /> 47 adjourn the meeting at 10:12 p.m. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 50 <br />