Orange County NC Website
17 <br /> 1 United States which gave them enough information to do some research in Orange County and <br /> 2 maybe surrounding counties. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 BACKGROUND: Orange County is one of the few counties in North Carolina that can impose <br /> 5 school impact fees because the County obtained special local enabling legislation from the <br /> 6 State in 1987. In 1993, the County acted upon this authority and, in collaboration with the <br /> 7 Towns and School Districts, began the fee assessment. Since then, the County has <br /> 8 occasionally (every few years) updated the fees based on school costs, categories of housing, <br /> 9 etc. Findings of impact, benefit, and proportionality must be shown to form a good methodology <br /> 10 and legal basis. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 The Ordinance requires impact fees be paid for new residential construction in order to assist <br /> 13 with educational impact costs associated with new students. A developer has recently <br /> 14 approached staff to request that an exception be created for age-restricted housing, i.e. <br /> 15 housing that would be limited by deed or covenant restrictions to housing for persons over a <br /> 16 minimum age (see attached letter). The developer prefers the exception be created as quickly <br /> 17 as possible. If the Board is interested in pursuing an amendment to the Ordinance, Planning <br /> 18 staff recommends that the decision be based on relevant data because of the requirements <br /> 19 necessary to set impact fee levels. There are two possible methods to achieve data needs: <br /> 20 1. Require the developer requesting this exception provide information about other age <br /> 21 restricted projects in a specific geographic area (to be determined) and have staff evaluate the <br /> 22 data to determine probable impacts. <br /> 23 2. Conduct a student generation rate study specifically for age-restricted housing and assess <br /> 24 the fee accordingly. Historically, such studies have been completed by a consultant with data <br /> 25 supplied by the local governments. (This method is preferable due to the enhanced ability to <br /> 26 defend the outcome of the study). <br /> 27 <br /> 28 It should be noted that a new impact fee study (which includes the accompanying student <br /> 29 generation rate analysis) has been requested by Planning in the department's FY 2015-16 <br /> 30 Budget (approximately $70,000) since the last study was completed in 2007. If recommended <br /> 31 by the Manager and approved by the Board, the new impact fee study would disaggregate <br /> 32 housing types by number of bedrooms (similar to the 2014 study which evaluated only housing <br /> 33 that had been constructed in the past 10 years; impact fees must be based on the entire <br /> 34 housing stock). It would be possible to include age-restricted housing as a housing type in this <br /> 35 new study, but the results of the study would likely not be available until early 2016 and would <br /> 36 then have to be adopted. This timeframe may be longer than the developer would prefer. It <br /> 37 should be noted that the Educational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance (EFIFO) is independent <br /> 38 from the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (SAPFO) with only the student <br /> 39 generation rates having a common data ingredient. Because the special local enabling <br /> 40 legislation for the EFIFO is grounded in land use and zoning authority, any changes to the <br /> 41 Ordinance must be advertised in accordance with statute requirements and must be heard at a <br /> 42 public hearing. The public hearing can be on a regular BOCC meeting agenda (e.g., it is not <br /> 43 restricted to only the quarterly public hearings). <br /> 44 <br /> 45 A student generation rate study specifically for age-restricted housing (Option #2 above) would <br /> 46 likely cost approximately $15,000 and would require staff time from all of the local governments <br /> 47 within Orange County and the school districts to compile raw data. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Option #1 would require County staff time to evaluate the information provided by the <br /> 50 developer. If the ordinance is amended, there would likely be a reduction in impact fees <br />