Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2015 8:42:45 AM
Creation date
8/31/2015 8:39:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/1/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-01-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> 1 Perdita Holtz said there is a difference between saying you have to be there and <br /> 2 requiring a quorum to move forward. <br /> 3 Chair McKee agreed when the public, Commissioners, and staff are all present and <br /> 4 ready to proceed, it is frustrating to cancel a meeting simply due to the lack of a quorum. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 3. Private Road and Access Standards <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Abigaile Pittman, Transportation and Land Use Planner, made the following PowerPoint <br /> 9 presentation <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Private Road and Access Standards <br /> 12 Purpose: To receive an update and provide guidance on options for addressing various <br /> 13 private road access concerns. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Background <br /> 16 Addressing Private Road Access Concerns <br /> 17 • Included in 2014 Work Plans <br /> 18 o OUTBoard <br /> 19 o Planning Board <br /> 20 • 05/20/2014 — BOCC authorization to proceed <br /> 21 • 12/09/2014 —BOCC Info Item summary of input and received approval to return with <br /> 22 possible actions. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Abstract Includes: <br /> 25 • A review of existing private road standards; and <br /> 26 • A grouping of possible options or action that could be pursued, grouped as follows: <br /> 27 o Possible amendments to the UDO, including some from the Fire Council. <br /> 28 o A report/list of items that cannot be addressed through amendments to the UDO; <br /> 29 and <br /> 30 o Options for addressing emergency access for trail systems, either in or outside <br /> 31 the UDO. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Current UDO Regulations- Road Development <br /> 34 1) Class A <br /> 35 • Serves 6-12 lots or dwelling units <br /> 36 • 50 ft. right-of-way <br /> 37 • 18 ft. travel-way <br /> 38 • Road maintenance agreement <br /> 39 • Property owners responsible <br /> 40 Class B <br /> 41 • Serves 1-5 lots or dwelling units <br /> 42 • 50 ft. right-of-way <br /> 43 • No standard travel-way width <br /> 44 • Road maintenance agreement <br /> 45 • Property owners responsible <br /> 46 <br /> 47 >13 lots or dwelling units <br /> 48 • Exempt Subdivisions per NC General Statutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.