Agenda - 09-01-2015 - 6a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

34 1 2 James Bryan: Thank you, Mr. Chair. It's fine to proceed. There was proper notice of this 3 meeting so that's the due process notice that is given to the Public that there may be additional 4 information. As long as the application was complete at its submittal, amendments can be fine. 5 There was, however, a mention of an amended site plan to be presented in the future. And that 6 would cause some concern, if it's not clearly proffered and articulated now what those are. So, 7 if it's included in the binder, that's fine. If it's something else that was demonstrated in some 8 sort of exhibit, that's fine— if it's going to be presented in another format. But anything like that 9 has to be clearly articulated today. 10 11 Chair McKee: Okay that was going to be my second question. There was a new site plan 12 submission for a buffer— moving the buffer from 50 to 65 feet. That, I believe, is part of this 13 abstract so does that therefore generate any concern on your part? 14 15 James Bryan: If we could just get the attorney just to confirm on the record, "yes". 16 17 Beth Trahos: Yes. It is included on the site plan as I am told, that the green screen as well is 18 indicated on the site plan. So those changes are a part of the plan that was submitted today. 19 20 Chair McKee: So, again, to the attorney, you are comfortable that the late submissions, for 21 lack of a better word —or the submissions at the meeting tonight— are acceptable. 22 23 James Bryan: Yes, if I may—just to take just a second longer to describe the process—, so, a 24 Special Use Permit says that you've got a general right to the use of this property—for this 25 intended use, if you meet these conditions. If there is some area where there's a lack of 26 meeting any of this —that's where these conditions get put on. It's very common for these 27 conditions to be changed throughout this Public Hearing process. It's evidence that there's a 28 need —that there was an awareness of this need prior to—and a solution — prior to this meeting. 29 It's just a benefit provided by the Applicant and the neighbors. They did good work beforehand 30 and the staff as well. So everything should be good. 31 32 Chair McKee: Okay. Very good. Then I —then I will assume we will move forward with this... 33 34 James Bryan: Yes 35 36 Beth Trahos: Mr. Chairman, I apologize. Let me just add one more thing as we were talking. 1 37 do want to confirm that a condition also is that 30 feet of the 65 foot buffer along the northern 38 property line will be an undisturbed area. And that is not particularly or specifically laid out on 39 the site plan itself but we would offer that as a condition. 40 41 Chair McKee: And I believe you had mentioned that in your your previous testimony. 42 43 Beth Trahos: Yes sir. 44 45 Chair McKee: Very good. Are there any other questions, specifically on this project from the 46 Board, or for the Planning Board? 47 48 Chair McKee: Seeing none. Yes....? 49 50 Commissioner Dorosin: Just to clarify...it's going to be subdivided into two parcels, or there's 51 just a line that's delineating...