0059.G ,
<br /> I. iny of tho Prounch K the 1 1 on""
<br /> and da- Lo the snvy " " It NICK th: Slud! jnd!CNIC �
<br /> tLat nz h• .s rair an malch I Or& . . N. .
<br /> Unruh 8 March I I , NNTch I ; Q'A 19 , Awych 20' An "
<br /> 15Tch 24 , March 20 , U" "ch Accoydin"I) , no bKPIC
<br /> Jnt joych, for the most po-. D!2 totl to do anti
<br /> 9,radinn and LOT] WtIJU "Th the It should R
<br /> 0
<br /> noted fo-, April that Yu oii Apr-1 1 T 4
<br /> April 8, April 9, April I'aP Api i ., I-! , i!Idic:at.in
<br /> t i I is V.I I C., "i 1 S t t I;0 1%o,-,-1�" 0 f ,1,TJ I wc rc ,na 5 i C a VC T�
<br /> on s a t i S F8 Ct 0 1 Y t a du an) C 0 r I C C t i ve Va r
<br /> In summary, ur submit:
<br /> 1 . that we c e i t a in I y should hvv o bc on p,I% en 11"OPPO T. not i cr
<br /> of tho Count) Commissioners' mEcting befoic action uas takni
<br /> 2 ,,, , , F...... failed to proper)l communicate with
<br /> Guarth Properties , Inc. about his dissatisfactiOn and
<br /> thnt he furthel failed to follow through oil comlirit-ments
<br /> he made in his February 2nd letter that all furthL ]
<br /> communications uould be by certified mail and kith all
<br /> indicated deadline
<br /> That 10, F,,C,an should have indionTed to Mr. Evans
<br /> when Mr, Yvans took over the job that there was a dcadlinc
<br /> and that Y,c yould be penalized if %ab did not meet that
<br /> deadline.•
<br /> 4 . Thnt the ...... .eather conditions in Februnry, NaTCh,
<br /> and April should have been taken into consideration before
<br /> this pcnalty was imposed
<br /> up ore certainly not indicntinp tint we belOve that Goforth Pyopert&F
<br /> Inc. hnd completely co plied in all vals I-Jft tku sc,[l 1;,I (31-ioa
<br /> ordinanco I d, h,lieve that my representatives wore nugligcM
<br /> ju not Performing same of the uoxk as Ust as T F": man had
<br /> lcqu?stod and the Erosion Control Act required. in that )tiO
<br /> complotod all work that Ni • FrecmaT) required of us after the stOP
<br /> tort order was issued in essentially a One-d& Pey!Od , it i-5
<br /> t,ii,j, indicated that we ware neg3i9clA in 'lot ilal111 I)P, f I
<br /> this VOK Mary expeditiously. I • ish to state further that we
<br /> have found Mr, Freeman re Ty fair and very professional in carrying
<br /> out his duties as the SOU nod Erosion Control Officer, We do,
<br /> bo"uvey, believe that he has been somev:hat indefinite in his
<br /> Q,unications with oul office and somewhat indefinite about som,,�
<br /> of ti ac, PToccelur,es tilat Ile. 1�,Ould lil,-c to havc carried cut within
<br /> the subdivisions. We, do not feel th'-lt S11 ould be
<br /> pcnali2ed HT this 12Ck of communication and for thO
<br /> that existed Kween MI , T"COT"all al"d our 0117ice IP Key of all
<br /> the considerations stated here , we believe that the 55 ,000-(!0
<br /> pcupit, wys extremcl) harsh and wa 7 all inappropriate procedurc P�
<br /> Wc , uccoiding11 , thlt th--
<br />
|