Agenda - 08-21-1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

th it cc t! licamun , in his Fehjuaiy 2 , 1979 lvtrci : 0 up . jyjj:: :Et : that if wo did not bring the site WO COMP1011WE Wthir inur working days of that elate that a slop ha& a Wei . ou I d be 05oud and tha it Stich f a i.iAll C I d hr - ieWiW to the County Commissioners for additional action NO 0001 correspondence ions 3ecolved by us indicatini that the efforts being made wei c not masoctop- L i Q Mi 11vuWan. it was therefore our opinion that due to both weather conditions and m3scWient conversations Chat our representative had with Mr. Reeman WE: we heyc smtisfactoTily mecting his requirement ; 1n A==rch of 1979, My Freeman indicated to me that he was Wing, difficulties with my field superintendent and believed that ve would have a better v-orRing -relationship and could got better results if T changed superintondents. 1 , accordingly, relieved Mi . Dan Fritz of this Tespon- sibilit) and arranged for MT . Vann EvEITIS to MeCt • ith Mi . Reeman. Mi . Evans met on the site wide Mr. FTUM011 and with My . Neville. our subcontractor, and they discussed all the points of the February 2nd letter that bad not Won completed. It is Mr . Evans ' opinion that My . Frooman agreed that the cork was to be perfoYmc6 Wthin a reasosablo time as the weather permitted.. It was noit1lor M" Evan!: nor Mr. Neville' s understanding that MT. Freeman MUM& a deadline an the work. It Should also be noted that subsequent letter from Mi . J'jecyjan oil t•JpTch 9 , 1979 ., thich discussed Section One, Stoncridge Subdi%.-Ision , did not in any way indicate that there Was Still d1S5atiSF2CQ0n with Section Two and Three of Stanciidge . It should also be noted that I had not received air), calls from My , FTCeMUn indicating dissatisfaction with Dir . Evans or vit"n, MI , Evans, performance, It is clearly apparent that zhcie was a breakdown in communication bethven MT . Evans an! Mr. Freeman. Mi. Room" StRteS A his Fcbruaiy 2n(] lcttei to us chat he was terminating all infornol , veybal, and nri-tun contacts regarding sedimentation control , He states further that future contacts .00uld be by ccTtUiod letter with deadlines for achieving compliance. We did :,at. TOCeiVe an) further communication from Mr. •ycemal-, by certified mail subsequent to February 2 , 1979 indicating any further problems oy any further difficulties . The only contact was a verbal contact made between Mr. Evans , A'.T - Txueman, and 1-o:- Neville. 1. The vonthex from February- to April 1.3th vas rather sevoic. The U. S. Weather Bureau report , a copy of which is attached, indicates that on Fobruaay 6th, ne had 2. 4 inches of snow; on February 7th , 2.9 inches of snot,.; on FcbTUaYY 9th, 1. 5 inches of snow; on February 18th, 10.3 inches of sncnw; anti an Fcbr6ar-,, 39th, 1/10th of one inch of snow In addition , it is indicated that ve had lain or-, -? I i Fobynal-) -0 , Fcbruary 23, Fobruary 24 , W Fcbruary 25. it is ccrtaiply indicated from these lWat.&Y Wndition= that vcry little work could have been aced mlishud in February of 19 19 due to the SCVCTC LTOOZing