Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-25-1979
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1970's
>
1979
>
Agenda - 06-25-1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2015 10:25:21 AM
Creation date
7/14/2015 10:25:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/25/1979
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
er)4,1 <br /> To: Orange Director' <br /> Commissioners <br /> tor• <br /> From: <br /> Date: June 25, 1979 <br /> Subject: County collection functions and related finance reorganization <br /> The purpose of this memo is to pror)se a change in the collections function <br /> apparent becom. aPP in recent <br /> brit, <br /> •,' the County and related financial opera::�cns to maximize efficiency, <br /> particularly, to meet other requirements that have <br /> weeks. <br /> The primary item of concern is the Family Planning fees collection that nd area of <br /> was first made known to me on June 5,1979. Ass cproposed to ben released tfrom <br /> Support Enforcement Program (IV-D) It is bee <br /> recommendation that these be <br /> the direction of the County attorneys. <br /> office enue ctor other revenue <br /> placed under a lidatedicount trevcolle 's officeand theFinancecoffice. <br /> that currently take <br /> The obvious reasons for this are: one, <br /> that N.C. General Statute s.require <br /> that the Financhaofficec a responsible for all functyonolprovides the most <br /> thereof; two, t <br /> consistent accountability; and, third, that the existing tax office has a <br /> track record of sound collection practices including knowledge of appropriate <br /> statutes and use of various tools to enforce collections. <br /> I propose several changes in the tax office that will require additionderived <br /> funding, but I have also proposed a source for these funds, that is, funds <br /> from additional indirect costs from ,- 1-'t fethDivisicr't Enforcementrrecommene <br /> letter attached of June 12, 1979). Also, <br /> dation is followed, additional administrative funds should be available there. <br /> Changes which are summarized in the attached budget sheets include: the <br /> creation of the position of Director of Revenues, <br /> to be assumed by the present <br /> tax collector who would retain that legal position; <br /> the deletion of the position <br /> of delinquent tax collector which was not required during the past year and <br /> replacing it with a rever�te clerk who t:o:ld be responsible for miscellaneous <br /> revenue and assisting tax col'.action when appropriate. A further position is <br /> recommended which would be the Health Revenue Clerk for the Family Planning <br /> collections. This clerk would work the Chapel Hill and revenues, <br /> but also assume responsibility as soon as possible, <br /> environmental fees, others if approved, and then the dental clinic when it comes <br /> on line. An additional clerk will be anticipated with the arrival of the dental <br /> clinic. <br /> I would further recommend several funded with <br /> service funds. I would like to recommend <br /> graded one classification and to u oryimplicationuin that it permits.herhto <br /> designation has considerable statutory of checks, vouchers, and purchase <br /> be assigned pre-audit duties including approval <br /> orders providing considerable relief t.• the Finance Uficer. The additional <br /> responsibility assigned should be accompanied by additional pay. <br /> I would also I a m n m aproval of a check <br /> signing, device to <br /> to our computer. a <br /> CETA summereworkerssO checks an was <br /> told 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.