Orange County NC Website
GRANGE COUN'T'Y COMMISSIONERS <br /> Doom No. 12 <br /> I06 EAST UARGA.RUr IANU <br /> MLz_sSoIt0UGH. N_C. <br /> 27278 <br /> RICHARD WftC[rro.Cbmr.n�r <br /> WORMANf WALKIM <br /> No"LkN GVSTAVE50H <br /> r]ONALD WILLHOCC <br /> ANNIZ BARNES <br /> February 15, 1979 <br /> Mr. Thomas �A. Bradshaw, Jr. <br /> Secretary <br /> Department of Transportation <br /> P. 0. Box 25201 <br /> Raleigh, NC 27611 <br /> Dear 4h:-8rad_shaw_; <br /> Much has been said recently about a proposed Southern By-Pass around <br /> Chapel Hill. Much also has been said about an alleged arrangement between the <br /> Department of Transportation and the Mayor of Chapel Hill, which goes something <br /> like this: Chapel Hill withdraws from the I-40 lawsuit, the Department of <br /> Transportation agrees to build the Southern By-Pass and uses its influence in <br /> the General Assembly to help the Town get extended planning ,jurisdiction beyond <br /> that which the County Commissioners recently approved. Enclosed is a recent <br /> newspaper report as background for this suggested scenario. <br /> The Orange County Commissioners would regard the State Department of <br /> Transportation's involving itself in a county extraterritorial planning matter <br /> highly inappropriate. It could also be interpreted as an affront to Boards of <br /> County Commissioners throughout the State, and particularly to the Orange County <br /> Board and the people it represents. <br /> It is unfortunate that this local planning extension issue, and your <br /> association with it, has been tied to the Southern By-Pass proposal . It is also <br /> regrettable that the Board of Commissioners has not been included in the DDT- <br /> UNC-Chapel Hill planning sessions even though your proposed corridor lies entirely <br /> outside the corporate limits of any municipality. Should the Commissioners assume <br /> at this point that DOT has no interest in Orange County's involvement regarding <br /> the By-Pass proposal? <br />