Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-05-1979
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1970's
>
1979
>
Agenda - 02-05-1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2015 9:19:54 AM
Creation date
7/14/2015 9:18:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/5/1979
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br /> Commissioners Memo <br /> January 26, 1979 <br /> Labor cost estimates for the sign crew are based on Alamance County's <br /> experience and anticipates a crew of four placing at least 15 signs a day. <br /> The project coordinator position should continue at least one year. <br /> Current CETA funding commitments and regulations terminate on September 30th. <br /> It is reasonable to assume, but not certain, this position could be continued <br /> after that date. <br /> GENERAL. COMMENTS <br /> If a CETA funded project coordinator is approved this project could <br /> be started almost immediately with no significant local expense in this <br /> fiscal year. If the Board elects not to allocate a CETA pos=ition the <br /> overall project budget estimate should be increased $9,500. The project <br /> however could still be started almost immediately if the Board provided <br /> funding for the coordinator's position. <br /> Appropriations for 600 signs and a crew to place these signs might <br /> be approved in the 7979-1980 budget. The naming process however will not <br /> be advanced far enough this summer to make installations efficient. I <br /> envision signs being acquired in the spring of 1980 and placed that summer, <br /> The problem I have with projecting a cost estimate for the project <br /> revolves around the time it will take to complete the naming process. I <br /> can locate no yardstick against which to measure. Alamance County has <br /> spent four years working on the area south of Interstate 85. However, <br /> they have no good time records. Their planning department worked on the <br /> project only when they had time available. The Durham County project <br /> was done many years ago and no records are available there. Thus, the <br /> cost figures for the coordinators time is more of a guess than an estimate. <br /> If you fill this position through CETA that program will provide at least <br /> seven months free time for the coordinator and possibly as much as eighteen <br /> months. This longer time span appears more than adequate to perform the <br /> task. However if the task force resolving name issues does not meet fre- <br /> quently and close out its cases regularity the project is apt to be pro- <br /> tracted over an unreasonably long time thus running up its cost as well <br /> as delaying maximum community benefit. <br /> We can expect an initial flare of sign vandalism which will subside. <br /> Alamance County now must replace about 10% of it signs annually. Our <br /> long run experience should not differ greatly from theirs. <br /> I have asked planning to investigate the practicality of developing <br /> a black and house numbering system for the rural area. If this idea <br /> proves reasonable block numbers might be affixed to our signs with the <br /> idea of implementing a rural house numbering system sometime in the future. <br /> In making this plan I have attempted to: <br /> A) Keep the Board of County Commissioners out of the entire process <br /> until a final public hearing. There you will receive a recommended <br /> road name from the "task force". I do not feel you have time to <br /> get more deeply involved in this process than necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.