Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-16-1979
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1970's
>
1979
>
Agenda - 01-16-1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 4:33:51 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 4:32:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/16/1979
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17I - E -• 1. Lhe rLn a'' Flak o€ z prep^.� subdivision shall be stbzWscted to <br /> she F'lant'rb Boa ci for ;+.na'. a,r -oval. The Yina7, Y1at. together With <br /> C2Ll (10' t=li - Ent , <br /> t%elve (12) dxJS prior to a re3t?s;1y scheduled Plamnic; Board neeri.^g <br /> FoM gel actisrz arpsovang a. tiisap~rc-!ng tine plat shall be tai�esx by <br /> the Planning Picard within thirty-six (36) days Pram the date of Cbe <br /> said meet.`.ng at 'd1hich IL is f_rst considered. Failure of the °!inning <br /> Board to wpprove or disapprove the final Iat Within the said thirty- <br /> ' siz; (36) days shall be deemad as approval of said plan and a cert� irate <br /> sha11. bx issued by the planning Board on demand, unless size subdivider <br /> shattld vaive this req---rement and consent to the extension of the <br /> . . thirty si-c (36) dszy period. If the Eival plat is disapproved, the <br /> reasons for disapproval shall be stated upon the xecordsrof the P lammin- <br /> _._ .. Board. ' <br /> age 9 Final plat <br /> I. Section III-E-I: Add: The Planning Board's decision may be appealed <br /> by tha subdivider to the County Commissioners. <br /> ECTICM IV. B= UE tED JIl rx-"Eu�I DESIGN STAVDAR S <br /> I4 - B - 2. L_MD S[i_TABrT t-'"E <br /> In revierwiog subd+v:.sion iroposals, the Planning Board, shall, <br /> cousi der the over•7.11 design of the proposat in light of the"'su r- <br /> ability of the lard for develucrent to insare that the platting atvd <br /> deveIopmen.t of the subdivisjo;t w+Ljl hat create a dander to the <br /> health; safatf, and welfare of Orange County ses3deacs. Each lot of <br /> a subdivision shall contain at_ leasr_one stre_uh �h is_cutt�h � <br /> :Ear development. Lots that are of restricted deve?a ment notentia.l <br /> shall be desi.gma.ted as such ou the 1-ae ard, by i=tru e - ad <br /> to the Orange Co=cy re«ist as s ac. w; i s� c ibed b <br /> 5ectlan lI% - E - 5 --a of :his Ordinecce. <br /> p ge 13, Land Suitability <br /> 1. Section Iv-B-2 (paragraph 1): Delete the following two sentences: Each <br /> lot of s subdivision shall contain at least one site which is suitable for <br /> development. Lots that are of restricted development potential shall be <br /> designated as such on the plat and by instrument recorded in the Orange <br /> County ;registry as specifically prescribed by Section III-£5-e of this <br /> ord:inance.: re lace with: Each lot that does not contain a suitable building <br /> site shall be desxgnated-on the plat as being of restri.ctetl development <br /> potential and by instrument xecarded in the Orange County registry as <br /> specifically prescribed by Section III-E--5_a of this ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.