Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-12-1978
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1970's
>
1978
>
Agenda - 06-12-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 2:38:54 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 2:38:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/12/1978
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page '3 <br /> Health Department Request 619,734 403,868* <br /> Difference Between Manager's Proposal <br /> and Department Request 1247,428 990428 <br /> IMPACT OF MANAGER'S PROP0SED BUDGET <br /> The Manager's dget by my analysis would allow us to 'hold-the-line' in all <br /> respects , if cautiously used. <br /> In Environmental Health, since we did receive a mid-year staff increase, we are <br /> staffed only one--h .f person short of Standards and we will be able to meet all required <br /> minimal work loads .and activities. I would recommend we delay until sometime into the <br /> next fiscal year any attempt to regulate private and semi-private water supplies. This <br /> would represent a large work load increase and I am presently uncertain as to.attempting <br /> this without additional staff. Not doing wells cuts our fee revenue potential approxi- <br /> mately in half. <br /> in Family Plarning we will continue as at present. We could not expand our load as <br /> our clinics are filled up and we would not have funds to hire staff (part-time) to hold <br /> additional clinics as proposed. We will continue to be concerned abo).t. teen pregnancy <br /> and provide health education time as at present. The proposed teen pregnancy prevention <br /> special effort could not be .instituted as sufficient health educator, nurse and clinic <br /> time will not exist . This is an interesting example of not doing one thing Leading to <br /> additional costs elsewhere. It is highly predictable that some youth we do not get to <br /> will end up with a child on A.F.D.C. <br /> The generalized preventative health education effort for the community could not <br /> be implemented as we could not hire the necessary health educator <br /> We.ideh.tified a V.D. epidemic in our narrative. We would continue to not act on <br /> this problan exeep as incidental to the Family Planning Program. <br /> We would not e able to give attention to tuberculosis as proposed. However , we <br /> have to expand our present service level here even if by reducing some other area or <br /> areas slightly. <br /> We would be urwise to attempt any solo-rectal cancer screening as we would not <br /> be able to follow Lp. Secondly, in terms of other chronic disease screening, we would <br /> be able to ,expand cur present level (but not as much as proposed) as we are better or- <br /> ganized and trained now. <br /> Our Maternal ealth and Child Health patient loads are, when compared to community <br /> need, quite inade ate. We would not be able to do significantly more than at present. <br /> Regards Schoo. Health: I cannot recommend continuing to provide more aid to Chapel <br /> Hill/Carrboro than Orange County. I do not value either set of students more. At the <br /> proposed budget le el we would not have the option of expanding the Orange County School <br /> Health services. he present pattern of inadequate (when compared to need) school healt <br /> services will bec e worse as the schools mainstream children with little help from thiE <br /> department and wit the impact of inflation on parent's ability to obtain care for their <br /> children. <br /> Our request suggested increasing staff in Environmental. Health by one; taking on <br /> well regulation (ap roximately same size task as septic work); charging full cost recove <br /> fees at $73,000 per annum estimated rate, rather than partial fees of $25,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.