Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-31-1978
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1970's
>
1978
>
Agenda - 05-31-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2015 3:11:23 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 3:10:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/31/1978
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HIJL~cMMWW CITY SLHOOM <br /> POSED CtRREW EXPENSE BTU3 ET <br /> FOR 1978-79 <br /> Me prgprc�posed current ease budget presented to the Orange Ommt r <br /> Ccnnissiorers is the result of extensity discass= s and reviews i.rmolvi.ng <br /> teachers, ladni.nistrators, P.T.A. leaders, and the Board of Fducati.cn. <br /> It does ndt include all of the proposals of these various groups. Rather, <br /> it reflects those areas which have withstood careftal review and evaluation <br /> by all of the groups involved in the pass of snaking the difficult <br /> dices mcessary to produce a reasonable budget Est. <br /> This "sal calLS for an increase in the county per capita funds <br /> in the attaeitmt of $300,524.94, or an increase of $65.00 per pupil., from <br /> $353.00 to $418.00 per pupil. This ins incorporates the loss of <br /> 131 pupils in the Per Capita pa.ctribution for Cutapel. Hill. The proposal <br /> also calls for an increase of the special school district tax frart 25.5 <br /> to 29�. Art appraised valuation of $513,000,000 and a 95% collection rate <br /> was used tb project revenue. <br /> The basic of cont2nu3 ng prog'17Eus have been carefully reviewed by the <br /> staff and mod'fications as adjun-tmants have been proposed in several areas <br /> as a result of this evaluative process. The must significant increased <br /> dollar sts within the basic Pram category are the following: <br /> (1-) an n�se in the base Sal.axy of locally paid employees by 5%, and <br /> (2) an ' in the nuTber of locally paid teachers as a result of <br /> the lack of grcwth in the rnumber of pupils. The N. C. Legislature has <br /> not yet set a percentage incre fO2° salaries of state ennployees. The <br /> preposed p�xc+entage for loom employees (5%) will. be adjuster to reflect. <br /> the Sam percentage increase as t e state provides when that action is <br /> taken. (Should a 6% isa.lary increase be approved by the N. C. Legislature <br /> an additional $23,QOO would be rid) . It is imperative that locally <br /> paid enplayees and state paid mpl_oyees remain on the same salary schedule. <br /> The nurrbex I of state allocated tears for 1978-?9 is projected at 5 less <br /> than the c4rreZt year because the ctaxxent year's allot nent'anus based upon <br /> antici.p" grcwth which dial not occur. The fonmla will adjust itself <br /> neat 'year, e<'tin9 the reducticm in state teaching positions. <br /> The *t creased funds required to maintain n the basic program total. <br /> $182$027.0 " This a=Lmt is Fvaeded to ouver the increased costs described <br /> above. <br /> The ac�, or izraroved program inalu3ed in the proposed gent ex <br /> pease buddc t reflect essentially seven major emphases. The anticipated <br /> exist; of se iTl roven>Cnts is $289,070.38. <br /> 5--15x-78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.