Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-03-1978
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1970's
>
1978
>
Agenda - 04-03-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2015 4:33:21 PM
Creation date
7/9/2015 4:31:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/3/1978
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 6 <br /> 2. lity of a suit gainst the signers of the challenges. He stated the pur-- <br /> 3. pose of the sui would be for the County to recover cost incurred to the <br /> 4 . taxpayers of orange County. Not only the ..additi.onal amount allocated to& <br /> 5 . ($7,600) but th .legal fees and court flees involved. <br /> 6 . Commission r Walker disagreed with this recommendation by stating the <br /> 7 . process of vote , challenging had not been abused, that the challengers ha% <br /> B . challenged legs ly and this is their right. Mr. Walker added this is a wa <br /> 9 . of getting the lection Board to do its job, "it has not done its job in t <br /> 10 . past. " <br /> 11. Commissioner Gustaveson added that many innocent people in the County <br /> 12, have been abuse by the challengers, that to challenge a persons right to <br /> 13. vote should be I aced on evidences that that person has misinformed, or doeE <br /> 14. not live at certain residency., and etc. <br /> 15. Commission r Gustaveson moved that the Board authorize the County <br /> 16 . Attorney to loo into the possibility of filing a suit against the <br /> 17. challengers to recover cost incurred to the taxpayers of the County. <br /> 18. Commission r Willhoit seconded the motion. <br /> 19 . Commission r Walker stated that was a matter the Board of Commissione <br /> 20 . should not be i volve with. He added this matter was not on the agenda an <br /> 21. this was not the appropriate time to discuss this issue. <br /> 22. Chairman W itted stated it appeared to him that the matter was relati <br /> 23. and declared the motion valid. He then called for a vote on the motion. <br /> 24. Voting aye were Commissioners Gustaveson , Pinney, Whitted and Willhoi <br /> 25 . Voting nay was Commissioner Walker. <br /> 26. The motion was declared passed. <br /> 27. The Chairman recognized William Laws, Tax- Supervisor, who explained <br /> 28. the circumstanc s regarding Item 8 : Request approval of tax refund in the <br /> 29. amount of $109.63 to Donald R. Smith. <br /> 30. Mr. Laws explained that Mr. Smith had purchase the tax lien on an <br /> eight acre tray of land in Cheeks Townwhip which was listed as unknown. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.