Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1. _2- <br /> 2 - ordinance is e forced. <br /> 3 . The Count Attorney suggested that the Board authorize an injunc-Eivt <br /> 4 - relief, however, wait a day or two to see how the civil penalties go. Ii <br /> 5 . payment is not made, the County Attorney will press charges. <br /> 6 . The Board agreed to authorize the County Attorney to file for injunt <br /> 7 . relief and to evy civil penalities of $100 per day beginning March 15th. <br /> 8 . Mr. Freein n presented to the Board a similar violation for Brendle's <br /> 9 . Inc. The natu i) :e of this violation of the ordinance is contained in Secti <br /> 10 . 8 , Subsection Design and Performance of Control Measures , and Sectic <br /> 11• Compliance witl Plan Requirements . Specific violations are: 1. Failure t <br /> 12 . implement plan as approved by varying from construction sequence , 2) Fail <br /> 13. to provide eff -tive sediment control, and 3) Failure to take corrective <br /> 14 . action by give deadline, or a reasonable length of time thereafter. <br /> 15 . This is an 8 .2 acre tract of land which was approved September 26, 1977 . <br /> 16 . Mr. Freeman stated that as in the Eastowne Project, engineers , and other <br /> 17 . officials have failed to respond to letters which have been forwarded re- <br /> 18 . garding the via ations . <br /> 19• The Board greed to take the identical action with Brendle ' s Inc, <br /> 20 • as with Eastowna Associates . <br /> 21. <br /> 22 . <br /> 23. <br /> 24 . <br /> 25 . <br /> 26. <br /> 27 . <br /> 28. <br /> 29 . <br /> 3o . <br />