Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-01-1977
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1970's
>
1977
>
Agenda - 08-01-1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2016 10:30:06 AM
Creation date
7/7/2015 10:51:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/1/1977
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19770801
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1970's\1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE <br /> ORANGE COE)N�Y SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION <br /> County of Orange ) <br /> �etit.ioner } <br /> v ) JUDGMENT <br /> ) <br /> Town of Meb ne ) <br /> Respondent ) <br /> T is cause comes on to be heard by the undersigned <br /> Judge of th Superior Court upon motion by both the petitioner <br /> and the res ondent for judgment on the pleadings. <br /> This is an action brought pursuant to Section 1-253 <br /> et seq. of the General. Statutes of North Carolina for the <br /> interpretation of a contract between the parties, the same <br /> being attached to the petition and marked Exhibit "A, " and <br /> for an adjudication of the rights of the parties pursuant <br /> thereto. The court finds that there is a genuine dispute <br /> between the parties as to the matters set forth in the petition <br /> and that this is a proper case for a declaratory judgment and <br /> for consideration ofthe relief prayed for in the petition. <br /> The court further finds that there are no material <br /> facts in dispute between the petitioner and the respondent and <br /> that all matters in contention between the parties as set <br /> forth in the petition and the response are contentions as to <br /> matters of law and not offact, this being a proper case for <br /> final judgment by the court upon a consideration of the <br /> pleadings d the arguments of counsel for theFarties based <br /> thereon. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.