Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Article 7 <br /> 33. Benz Lloyd <br /> Re-study 7.1, 12, & 14. 133. Section .7.1 bas been clarified tc <br /> encourage PD's rather than requix <br /> 7.12 is intended to allow small <br /> commercial developmii nts. with a tc <br /> designed residential comimun.ity, t <br /> Why the commercial'uses are so cl <br /> defined. <br /> Article 8 <br /> 8.8.9 lb should be deleted (Consider Staff feels that any anew: airport: <br /> not tying any Orange Airport with the should conform to the airport: sts <br /> Triangle .J Council of Govn't;) and to any other documernt& the Cc <br /> has produced to govern its growtI <br /> 34. Ben Lloyd <br /> 8.16 Cemeteries. Clarify to mean 34. Staff agrees and bas clarified ti <br /> "commercial." not "church" cemeteries <br /> 8.19 Restrictions on the Utility Co. 's Staff feels there are inappropris <br /> need studying. for public utilities to iusta LI 1 <br /> transmission lines. <br /> Article 9 <br /> 35. Ben Lloyd <br /> Pg. 9-2, see. 945 delete 35. This section has been modified. <br /> 9-2 bottom paragraph-utility ,co. This section has been clarified. <br /> should have say-so on signs on poles <br /> on. private, property <br /> 9.2.8 Re-write (sign size) Staff does not agree with this c <br /> 9.3(h) Too restrictive This subsection has been deleted <br /> 9.5 Suggests maintenance on existing Staff disagrees. <br /> signs as :apposed to si.gta. restrictions. <br /> 36. ,john Cates <br /> Too expensive for citizens to comply 36. The County has seers fit to more <br /> with sign ordinance. Why should anwaty regulate other tbiugs and staff <br /> -say "no" to signs which State and Fed. that signs are In. need of regul.a <br /> govul t has approved. by the zoning ordinance. <br /> 37. Mrs. Barbour <br /> 9-8 Too restrictive 37. Staff does not agree <br /> Article 10 <br /> 10-1 Delete this section Staff does not agree. <br /> T <br />