Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
CITIZEN'S COM NTS STAFF COM ENTa <br /> 26. Mrs. Harbour <br /> 2.3.3.7 Questions the approval of 24. See Comment #24. <br /> Public over private interest's.. (it <br /> overrides individual righis in Orange <br /> Co.) <br /> Questions length of time the board will The zoning ordinance cannot legi.a <br /> take to act on appeals or Board's action by the Boakd of County <br /> disposition of matters. Commissioners. <br /> 27. Commissioner Barnes <br /> Questions Mrs. Barbour on what time <br /> limit she's referring to. <br /> 28. Mrs. Barbour <br /> Article 2 is inconsistent and should be 28. Staff thinks the inconsistencies <br /> reviewed. have now been taken care. of. <br /> Article 3 <br /> 29. Ben Lloyd <br /> 4.1 Studies on sewage in Efland area 29. Staff has no comment. <br /> are needed if it is zoned Residential. <br /> 4.10 Suggest using Eno State Bark for Staff has no comment. <br /> water supply and to delete Eno St. Park, <br /> from potential daze site is not good <br /> judgment. <br /> 30. Ed Copeland <br /> How will you provide sewage and water 30. '`Staff dares tot feel. the County ci <br /> treatment in an area that will not pass provide sanitary sewer to'all ray <br /> the perk test? (as his land is) that is not suitable for septic <br /> tanks and drainage fields. <br /> Article 5 <br /> No Comment <br /> Article 6 <br /> 31. Ben Lloyd <br /> Pg. 6.4 (6.12) Too restrictive 31. Staff does not agree. <br /> Pg. 6--2.1 "Too restrictive (100 ft. Staff does not agree.. <br /> restriction is goo great an area) <br /> 6.16.6.1 & 6.16.6.2 Too restrictive. These sections have been re-writt <br /> 32. Ricky Allen <br /> Favors the January meeting. <br /> 6.13.3 pg. 6.15 Look at this section 32. These performance standards appli <br /> closely (goes. 24-mo. compliance) to commercial and industrial, use: <br /> must comply with these yregulatioz <br /> within 24 moxiths. <br /> URA <br />