Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-09-1980
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1980
>
Agenda - 12-09-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 3:59:21 PM
Creation date
7/7/2015 10:00:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/9/1980
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19801209
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Citizen Comment: Planning Board & Staff Comment: <br /> R-3, R-5, R-7, R-5, R-10 <br /> Do all garages have to be attached Staff believes that in high <br /> and a maximum of 400 sq.ft. intensity use areas that is not <br /> a restrictive requirement. <br /> R-15, R-20 <br /> These seem, to be very unreasonable Lot sizes do not allow much variai <br /> restrictions on the attached garage. in placement and size of garages_ <br /> Will. S-52 and S-53 be rewritten to Staff has rewritten the sections <br /> add the wards non-profit (this comment and S-53 see the attached definit: <br /> applies to all residential districts) <br /> S-54-A Add the word riding before the Staff agrees. <br /> word club. <br /> Accessory uses A-4 garage square should Staff agrees and will develop a s:: <br /> be changes. scale depending on the lot size. <br /> Define what a home occupation is. See defixaition section. <br /> Define a commercial use. See definition section. <br /> Concern was expressed about allowing Performance standards will be att, <br /> extractive uses in a residential area. to the i.s miance of a special. use I <br /> which will protect adjacent uses. <br /> Airports and extractive uses should be a Staff does not agree as this w rxlc <br /> required rezoning rather than a special cause, spot zoning. <br /> use permit. <br /> Concern was expressed for the protection. The County Zoning ordinance can nc <br /> of mobile home owners and existing mobile govern putted uses within anoti <br /> home parks within the joint planning areas jurisdiction such as Chapel" Hill. <br /> of the County, those areas subject to <br /> annexation. <br /> Concern was expressed that agricultural Staff agrees but the problem is L <br /> land needed to be preserved in some way. than a zoning ordinance can handle <br /> P-5, Bus passenger shelters should be Staff agrees. <br /> permitted in all districts. <br /> The joint planning process should be a, two Staff agrees and feels the County <br /> way street and the County should not have Interests will be preserved by the <br /> to do all the compromising. process. <br /> Why is P-29 allowed in General industrial? Staff will strike this as a parmii <br /> The designation manufacturing will. be Staff comment_ <br /> changed to industrial. <br /> In rural industrial change negative impacts Staff is considering a special use <br /> to In-1- hnllnA p-)Y r +h m" 'Kis-I 1 A i— z_.._ _____,.,._T _--_-----a.__ x � .. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.