Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
citizen Comment: Plannin Board Staff Comment: <br /> Article 11 <br /> interpretations. is incompatible with the surrounai <br /> zones. heave wording as it is. <br /> The section should not prevent the This section refers to uses not <br /> t repair or maintenance of a structure. structures. <br /> will lots that are required to be Yes, these lots would be reassesse <br /> recombined be reassessed by the <br /> County Tax Office. <br /> Delete this whole section. (11.1) The staff would like more time for <br /> further study of this section. <br /> This section needs to be clarified(li.1b) Staff will try to reword this secs <br /> insert the wording... If a non-conforming Staff will check with Bob Leary tc <br /> use "is voluntarily abandoned by the owner if there is any reason not to use <br /> of the property". . . for more than.. . This wording. <br /> section should not allow a lessee to abandon <br /> a use but still retain the building and <br /> deny the owner of the property the use <br /> of the structure as a non-conformity. <br /> 50% proportion should be changed to 60% as This figure is flexible and can bi <br /> in the presant ordinance. set at any level that the Board ft <br /> appropriate. <br /> Add a section (c) with such wording as Staff feels this question is addi, <br /> "any structure. (commercial use) dwelling by section on Board of Adjustment <br /> can be rebuilt on a non-conforming lot. <br /> Zoning ordinance should not penalize the Hoard of .Adjustment can handle the <br /> owner of a non-conforming structure for the situation. <br /> occurance of a natrual diaster. <br /> -:� Strike the words "but not limitation"(11.12) Staff will reword this section so <br /> examples listed will. not be const, <br /> as a limitation. <br /> individuals must be allowed to repair and Staff is open to recommendations , <br /> maintain his property - regardless of the how repairs and maintenance shoula <br /> proportion of cost repair or maintenance is be handles. <br /> to the total value of the building. The <br /> owner could not,, of course, enlarge or ex <br /> - <br /> :pared the building. (11.13) <br /> General comment about structures 50% See previous comment on percent o <br /> destroyed that would have to be completely building destroyed. <br /> rebuilt, at a loss to the owner, of the <br /> value of the existing undamaged portion. <br /> You should put a period afterh the word Staff requests more time to resole <br /> restored. Drop the zest of the section. questions about 11.9 concerning <br />