Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-09-1980
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1980
>
Agenda - 12-09-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 3:59:21 PM
Creation date
7/7/2015 10:00:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/9/1980
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19801209
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dr. Gordon's Xema: Staff Cozuments <br /> 20.7 PdbU Hea a n aced N4tide Thereof <br /> 20.7.3 ' 'Wti.tter!."Ndti,ce ' y The second sentence was added at t <br /> Leave wording as it was approved by request of the Planning, Board to c <br /> Planning Hoard (keep sentences one and the notice requirements. <br /> three,' but delete sentence 2. Nowhere <br /> else in the ordinance are provisions <br /> for sending by certified mail followed <br /> by a sentence like sentence 2) <br /> Additift l Section <br /> Pt6yisidn-fot -Citi.zeu Petitidns This is a policy suggestion that t <br /> Discuss the possibility of having Staff feels ebul.d be added of the <br /> citizen petitions affect the commissioners' -and the County Commissioners wi.she <br /> vote on rezonings (and also Special use All petitions can presently be pre <br /> Permits) to all Boards. <br /> One possibility is found in the proposed <br /> Draft zoning Ordinance for Chapel Hill <br /> (Attachment D) (Note: Bob Leary is <br /> Chapel. Hill's consultant also) <br /> 20.11 Comprehensive Review of Chaj�ter <br /> Change "three years" to "five years". Staff suggests, three years be reta <br /> Article .21 -- Adininistration <br /> 21.3 Powers and Limitations 'of Zfting Restrictive covenants are civil ma <br /> Officer which do not and shduld not concer <br /> d) Restrictive Covenants „- What is the Orange: County. We could not enfor <br /> ].,egal status of restrictive covenants? them in any case. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.