Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-09-1980
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1980
>
Agenda - 12-09-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 3:59:21 PM
Creation date
7/7/2015 10:00:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/9/1980
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19801209
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dr. Gordon's Memo: Staff Cements: <br /> 4.2.25 Reservoir Protection -- missing 4:2.25 The Water Task Force asked tha <br /> reference to reserwi.r protection <br /> deleted from the ordinance at this <br /> They washed to proceed with their <br /> recommendations and could be forth <br /> coming with certain suggestions. <br /> 4.3 Permitted Use Table <br /> Accessri es - Last of accessory There is no need to list the permi <br /> uses for each di.stri.ct is missing -accessory usesx since the def:in3.ti <br /> states what an. accessory use is. <br /> Planned Dewelc5'r eeits - Should be some There is cross reference for perms <br /> cross-reference between permitted uses in Subsection. 7.14.2, 7.15.4, <br /> .axed Special, Uses, and Planned 7,.16.2p etc. <br /> Developments <br /> Article 5 - Dimensional. Requirements <br /> 5.1.1 and 5.1 <br /> Distinction between Lot bX Lot and <br /> Planned 'Developr ertt 'i a 'nat'clear <br /> Suggestions: Label headings more The tables will be-somewhat redise <br /> clearly or go back to using four tables make more clear the distinction be <br /> instead of two various headings. <br /> There is no maximum height limit(H2) <br /> Board decided to table discussion of <br /> maximum building height on Sept. 29. <br /> Suggestion: Staff should prepare :Staff floes not feels a maximesm heig <br /> suggested height limit (H2) and enter is necessary in Ot=ge County with <br /> into table. added setbacks required. We could <br /> change it to read 2' of additional <br /> setback for each additional 11' of <br /> height. <br /> LUI (Land Use Intensity System) The Staff has prepared a revised L <br /> The Board neven really discussed this schedule for the pLanning board wh <br /> system, though we dial hear Mr. Leary's addresses most of lam. Gordoa'Rs con <br /> presentation. <br /> Article 6- ARplication of Dimensi.oAal <br /> 'Regat6ments , <br /> 6.2 Height Limitations <br /> 6.2.1 No Secondary (H2) Height Limitation Staff feels that if an Jhdividual <br /> as long as setback requirements are met. ;per, R-1 district car affort to bui <br /> 14-story single family house, he sh <br /> be able to as only single family h, <br /> are allowed in theses districts. <br /> Basically the same comment is true <br /> for all residentiall. districts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.