Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Dr. Gordon's Me=: Staff Comments: <br /> 2.3.3.4 Notice - On November 4, 1980 Staff hAs recommended some changes <br /> the planning Board voted to require in what the Board approved 11.4.80 <br /> posting of signs and Frritten (See Staff memo on specific cbauge <br /> notice for adjacent property owners. <br /> Included were meetings for special <br /> use permits (2.3.2.b) and <br /> variances (2.3.2.c). <br /> Article 4 = Petrk.tted UAd Table <br /> Establishment of Permitted Use`Table. <br /> m. Geti#-ral ,COmmeiits -�- U661th & Safet Y The general. health and safety <br /> There axe no specifications ' requiremiants are built in to state <br /> concerning fire protection or like "urban services;. Triese <br /> other health and safety considerations, mean that rUrRl a-ear,,, require less <br /> except for sewer and water. the way of police protection, fire <br /> protection etc. because they are I{ <br /> dense. <br /> Access Access requirements are not Access statements are. included in <br /> always given districts except the very broad AR <br /> R-1 districts, these do not requir <br /> access criteria. The AS and PID <br /> district will have very limited <br /> access requirements; <br /> 4.2.8; 4.2.9, 4.2.10, 4.2.11 <br /> Commercial Districts: 2-Cl, NC-2, 4.2.8 These districts have been somewl <br /> CC"3; "GC--4 Three of these districts re�wfitten to allow its applicati.o: <br /> appear to have limited applicability. Commercial Transition Activity <br /> LC-1 May be limited to Carrboro Nodes or Rural Coum�uulty/Rura.l <br /> joint planning area Neighborhood Nodes. <br /> However, it is my understanding that 4.2.10 This is restri:eted .to existing <br /> we have eliminated proposed activity type developments at'Commercia3. Ac <br /> nodes from the County Land Use Plan, Nodes 'or to use as a PD within <br /> and only show areas with existing Chapel,H�€ll's transition area. <br /> commercial uses. (Ind. uses, also) <br /> 4.2.11 The GC-4 district has been re- <br /> Potential Problem with Land Use plan to make the inten6 clearer. It sh <br /> and/or Propas d:0rdiiiartce: Do we applied to existing 'Commercial use <br /> have enoujh designated activity at Nodes within the uuzoued townsh <br /> nodes and/or commercial districts? It will also be applied iu the fut <br /> (Same problem with Ind. Districts) Cheeks, Hillsborough, and Eno town <br /> at designated Commercial. or Indust <br /> Activity Nodes: <br />