Agenda - 11-03-1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1 Planning Board - Minutes September 15, 1986 Page 2 Br. Irvin observed that lots B, 9 and 10 could be undersized if that particular property line.were incorrect. Dr- Irvin felt. the property � line issue should.be resolved before subdivision approval- Both Mr. Phelps and Mr. Shanklin stated that each had attempted to resolve the - boundary problem, but that the other would not cooperate- Mr. Cannity showed the Board the surrounding land uses_ iris. Cranford asked if one acre lots were in character with the area. Dr. Irvin moved and Mrs. Lunsford seconded the motion that the Board defer approval for 30 days to allow Mr. Shanklin and Mr. Carter to resolve the question of the property lane. Mr. Cleary protested saying: while he agrees the property line issue should be resolved, the staff has recommended approval of the subdivision and a registered surveyor has certified the accuracy of they line. 'Dr. Kizer agreed with Mr- Cleary. Ms. Crawford said that it might set a dangerous precedant Ms. Lunsford felt the property line problem should be resolved. Dr. Kizer said the crux of the issue was whether the property line would create- substandard (� .92 acre) lots i.f it were incorrectly drawn. Dr. Irvin said that he agreed with Dr. Kizer but felt that deferring this 30 days would not set a bad precedent. Dr. Irvin suggested that the 30 day period would give Mr_ Shanklin time to hire a surveyor and bring more information to the Board. The question was called and the motion passed unamiously: ITEM u4 Joint Planning Report Mr. Benson briefly stated the entire Joint Planning Program started with Chapel Hill's request to extend their extra-territorial planning juris- diction. mt. Polatty added, that the earlier discussion concerning the Grange Comprehensive Planning Council antecedent of Joint Planning. Mr. Benson presented the report. The first section was the Administrative Mechanism. ' He pointed out the number of administrative bodies that review development proposals, where there would be joint review of proposals, with the final approval given by the County. The Joint Planning agreement will be between Orange County, Chapel hill and Carrboro. Ms. Crawford asked what problem would be created with any changes in the jurisdiction's various ordinances and how they would be handled under joint Planning. Ms. Crawford asked how orange County could be assured that the policy would be carried out within other jurisdications. Brian Benson replied that this had been set out in this document. The courtsey review of development proposals was the main policy tool.