Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
r r� <br /> ORANGE COUINTy PLANNING Dr--PART1vMNT <br /> 11ILLSBOROITGR <br /> XORTTE CAR03M7A <br /> 27278 <br /> 6aLLa10 �Y 6 - <br /> 4 <br /> PLANNING BOARD T'4=TFS <br /> October 7, 1980 ` <br /> Members Present- Dr. Logan Irvin, Att Cleary, Dr'. John Wilson, Dr. <br /> Steve Ki,,r, Mrs. Hazel Lunsford, Ms. Nancy Laszlo, <br /> Robert D. Greer <br /> Staff Presents dim Polatty, Rack CannityY Sue Wagoner <br /> Item #1 "here were no additions to the agenda- <br /> Item #2 Minutes from September 29, 30, 1980 me etings were approved <br /> with corrections- <br /> Item #3 Carrie Copeland Subdivision <br /> Mr. Cannity used aerial photographs and a County tax map to <br /> show the exact location of the Copeland properties, Be then <br /> explained the reason for requesting exemption for the road <br /> at the <br /> Depart- <br /> construction with the understanding th <br /> ment would be given a maintenance agreement annd d provisions Depart <br /> sions foo <br /> r <br /> an escrow account wdoul3 be made if necessary_ <br /> Mr. Cannity stated that Dalton Loftin, Attorney ncy d <br /> Carrie Bateman were present to answer any questions the <br /> Board might have. <br /> Dr. Irvin asked if the Batemans could not afford to build <br /> this road until the lots were sold: ' <br /> Mr. Cleary stated this was a,single ownefship situation- 161x, <br /> Loftin: stated the s=veyor had put Carrie Bateman on the plat <br /> because she was the Berson listed on the tax records as the <br /> owner. He gave a brief history of..the Copeland property,. <br /> saying he would provide a more detailed explanation upon re- <br /> quest. Mr. Loftin indicated that the owners'of lots 2 and 3 <br /> were unwilling to sign a road maintenance agreement at this <br /> time_ <br /> Dr. Kizer asked if a right of way had been reserved <br /> extends <br /> in <br /> ndthe <br /> deeds. Mr. Loftin answered yes, saying the y0aa <br /> from a state maintained road through lots I and 2, Be <br /> further indicated that part of the proposed road had been <br /> recorded in 1902. <br /> -1 <br />